Answer:
C.
Explanation:
It will determine the future security of the nation
Suppose both john and bill can do two tasks in a day. if john can do each of the two tasks faster than bill, then <u>John should specialize in performing the task for which he has a </u><u>comparative advantage</u><u>. </u>
Comparative advantage refers to the capacity to provide goods and offerings at a lower possibility price, not always at a greater quantity or satisfactory. Comparative gain is a key perception that trade will still occur even though one u . s . has an absolute gain in all products.
In an economic model, retailers have a comparative advantage over others in producing a selected desirable if they can produce that excellent at a lower relative opportunity price or autarky rate, i.e. at a decrease relative marginal price previous to trade.
In economics, a comparative advantage occurs when a country can produce a very good or carrier at a lower opportunity value than another u . s .. The principle of comparative gain is attributed to political economist David Ricardo, who wrote the book standards of Political economic system and Taxation (1817).
<u />
Learn more about comparative advantage here brainly.com/question/14846093
#SPJ4
Denise is now facing <u>"frictional" </u>unemployment.
Frictional unemployment is when workers are jobless and searching for work in a solid economy. It doesn't make a difference on the off chance that they leave willfully or are let go. Others might restore the work compel. It's separated from different kinds of unemployment in light of the fact that it's a piece of typical work turnover.
Frictional unemployment is unavoidable. Fortunately it's typically here and now. It's one of the parts of common unemployment. It is the most minimal rate of joblessness in a developing economy . unemployment underneath that level means businesses can't discover enough specialists to continue delivering everything they can. It moderates monetary development.
Based on the historical account, the English Bill of Rights limited the power of "King William & Queen Mary" and gave framers of the constitution the idea of "limited government."
This is evident in the fact that when the English Bill of Rights was made, it was King William III and Queen Mary II that signed the document into law.
On the other hand, the framers of the United States Constitution were influenced by the English Bill of Rights.
They believed that the Bill of Rights would limit the federal government's power and protect the rights of citizens and the States.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the English Bill of Rights greatly impacted the United States constitution formation.
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/12448477
Answer:
I had disagreed. I responded to it by calmly stating my opinion towards the point that had been raised and made sure that I didn't offend anyone during me doing so.
