Answer: the representation of states in Congress.
<em>The Great Compromise and the Three-Fifths Compromise both focused on </em><em>the representation of states in Congress.</em>
Both of these compromises were devised during the United States Constitutional Convention in 1787. The Great Compromise resolved a dispute between small population states and large population states. The large population states wanted representation in Congress to be based on a state's population size. The smaller states feared this would lead to unchecked dominance by the big states; they wanted all states to receive the same amount of representation. The Great Compromise created a bicameral (two-chamber) legislature. Representation in the House of Representatives would be based on population. In the Senate, all states would have the same amount of representation, by two Senators.
The Three-Fifths Compromise was a way of accounting (somewhat) for the population of slaves in states that permitted slavery. For taxation and representation purposes, the question was whether slaves should count in the population figures. (They were not considered voting citizens at that time.) The Three-Fifths Compromise said that three out of every five slaves could be counted when determining a state's population size for determining how many seats that state would receive in the House of Representatives.
Answer:
The Counter-Reformation, also called the Catholic Reformation or the Catholic Revival, was the period of Catholic resurgence that was initiated in response to the Protestant Reformation. It began with the Council of Trent and largely ended with the conclusion of the European wars of religion in 1648.
Explanation:
The Bills of Rights : A. Reduced the Restrictiveness of constitutionalism by having the Seven Ammenmends that guarantee that the constitution be kept fresh and current to the needs of the citizens.
By protecting the fudamental rights of the citizens, the Bill of Rights secures the rights of the people above the interests of the government.
It means that the restrictive parts of the constitution or the government cannot be put above the civil rights presented in the Bill of Rights.
Answer:
A
3/4 of the states have to ratify it in order for the ammendemtn to pass.
Explanation:
I'm definitely not good at it. Sorry. :/
