The audience is experiencing narcotizing dysfunction if fails to take action after seeing prolonged reports on natural disasters or human rights violations.
<h3>What is narcotizing dysfunction?</h3>
This is the theory that has it that people may lose their apathy to certain issues based on the fact that the media is outspoken on those particular issues.
This theory tells is that people may begin to care less about certain issues that are serious because much light has been shed on those issues.
The audience has seen so much reports on the issues of natural disaster till they have started to show little concern about it.
Read more on human rights violations here:
brainly.com/question/1274113
#SPJ1
The difference in emotional reaction could be explained by <span>Schachter two-factor theory; labeling emotion to the event
When Astrid is watching the horror movie, the emotional arousal would induce the production of adrenaline within her body, which create a sense of excitement.
When the boyfriend called under this circumstances, she will associate that sense of excitement toward the existence of the boyfriend that could be interpreted as love.</span>
Answer:
(D). Potential development of substitute products and bargaining power of consumers
Explanation:
According to Michael Porter, <u>there are five forces that should be analyzed to determine the degree of competitiveness in any industry</u> and they include; the bargaining power of suppliers, the bargaining power of consumers, threat of new entrants, threat of substitute products and the rivalry among competing firms in the industry.
Answer: Richard Nixon believe in a smaller but efficient government.
Explanation: I think because he wanted people to have power again. His goal was to empower local governments to deliver local services, but in doing so he made them even more beholden to the federal purse. Under Nixon, domestic spending grew from a little more than 10% of GDP to almost 14%.
