The following figures are similar. They are both the same shape, One is just bigger.
Answer:
Part a. The graph does not model a proportional relationship.
Part b. The values in table model a proportional relation.
3.5 minutes per mile.
Step-by-step explanation:
Part a.
The graph shown in the question representing Janet's data is not a straight line although it passes through the origin.
That is why the rate of change of distance with time is not constant.
Therefore, the graph does not model a proportional relationship.
Part b.
If we plot the data in the table using distance in miles along the y-axis and time in minutes along the x-axis, then we will get a straight line passing through the origin.
So, the values in the table model a proportional relation.
Now, Tarik's unit rate in minutes per miles will be
minutes per mile. (Answer)
Answer:
(-7,-4)
Step-by-step explanation:
hope this helps bro
Answer:
f(-5) = 4(-5) + 1 = -20 + 1 = -19
f(-1) = 4(-1) + 1 = -4 + 1 = -3
f(2) = 4(2) + 1 = 8 + 1 = 9
f(3) = 4(3) + 1 = 12 + 1 = 13
f(5) = 4(5) + 1 = 20 + 1 = 21