1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Zina [86]
3 years ago
10

Explain why it is better to not use rhetorical questions in a research paper?

English
2 answers:
makvit [3.9K]3 years ago
8 0
Rhetorical questions carry the purpose of persuasion, which you obviously don't need in a research paper, where everything is based on fact. This usually applies in the case of discursive essays, or narrations. Plus, an audience listening to a research paper will probably only be interested in the information strictly, and will be irritated by rhetorical questions. 
umka2103 [35]3 years ago
4 0
A research paper is fact and nothing but the fact. A research paper is just giving information about a topic. However, rhetorical questions are used to persuade the reader to believe or agree with something, mainly in a discursive essay; but in a research paper, you aren't persuading, you are educating.
You might be interested in
ENLGISH HELP!!! AGAIN!!! MARKING BRAILIEST!!
ExtremeBDS [4]

Answer:

i believe c

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
Why does Bill Moyers ask Alice Walker to read some of her poetry during the interview?
Likurg_2 [28]
Because Bill Moyers want to know that people about her poetry.
6 0
2 years ago
Plz help! This is for the crucible, btw
riadik2000 [5.3K]

Answer: The phenomenon of witchcraft therefore highlights both the need to believe in stories and the capacity to see through them.

Explanation:

Witchcraft is often thought of, wrongly, as a thing of the past. In fact, it continues to be taken seriously by people all over the world. But because the subject of this study is, specifically, early modern witchcraft and its dramatic representation, it will be necessary to clarify what the term ‘witch’ meant within this specific context. As several early modern authors on witchcraft argued, the meaning of the word has changed over time. The senses in which ancient Latin or Greek authors used the terms that are typically translated as ‘witch’ are distinct from the senses in which sixteenth- and seventeenth- century English people used those terms, as well as from the senses in which the word might be understood in the present. The situation is further complicated by the variety of different understandings of what defined witchcraft in early modern England. Accusations of witchcraft tended to focus on the issue of maleficium – the harm it caused – while theoretical writings on witchcraft were usually more interested in the witches’ supposed pact with the devil. Magical power might be conceived of as inherent in the witch herself, in the objects or words she used, in the spirit with which she bargained, or as merely illusory. Disagreement over these and other issues continued throughout the period during which witchcraft was a criminal offence.

One assumption of this study – widely but not universally shared today – is that magic operating outside the laws of nature and bargains with the devil are not and never were possible, and that people, both past and present, who believed these things to be possible were, and are, mistaken. Consequently, there can be no definitive description of what a witch was, only a description of what a given person or group of people imagined a witch to be. Assuming that witches did not exist in the sense that they were often believed to, it is hardly surprising that early modern society did not reach a consensus on what witchcraft was; the subject was debated for centuries and eventually faded from public discourse without ever having been resolved. No work on early modern witchcraft, therefore, can ignore the fact that there was a wide range of opinion on the matter. Furthermore, it would be misleading simply to rely on an exhaustive list of the various opinions (even assuming all of these were documented). Many early modern people appear to have been quite flexible in what they were prepared to believe, and ideas about witchcraft were often fluid rather than fixed points of reference against which real-life situations might be judged. Many people were open to persuasion and argument, evidence was often open to interpretation, and whether a given proposition about an alleged witch was accepted or not might depend on a variety of local factors. Nonetheless, some broad generalisations are possible. One important point is that the late medieval and early modern period in Europe saw the emergence of a specifically Christian conception of witchcraft. Witchcraft belief, and laws against witchcraft, had existed long before this. But from the fifteenth century onwards, important people within the late medieval Church began to accept the idea that witches were evil and genuinely powerful servants of the devil, and could therefore be punished as a species of heretic. Perhaps the most important texts here are the Malleus Maleficarum (1486) of Institoris and Sprenger and the decree made by Innocent VIII, which lent papal authority to the subsequent witch-hunts in Germany. Always controversial, always contested, this idea nevertheless spread through Europe and led to a period of intense witchcraft persecution, peaking in the late sixteenth century. This conception of witchcraft is described in a variety of theological, medical, and philosophical writings and constitutes an important part of the body of work known as demonology. Demonological views of witchcraft frequently form the intellectual context of this study.

7 0
2 years ago
Contractionary monetary policy is designed to:
Dahasolnce [82]

Answer:

Explanation:

Contractionary monetary policy is driven by increases in the various base interest rates controlled by modern central banks or other means producing growth in the money supply. The goal is to reduce inflation by limiting the amount of active money circulating in the economy.

5 0
3 years ago
? Question
Alex73 [517]

Answer:

playful and comical

Explanation:

From the excerpt, the mood is  playful and comical.

This is true because the author revealed that they "pattered pitty-pat, pitty-pat each with feet  and toenails, ears and hair, everything but tails,..." This shows that they were in a playful mood. Also, despite the way they pattered, when they got to the Philadelphia union depot, they had nothing to say. This also added a comical effect in the excerpt.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which theme best expressed in “The Gift of the Magi”?
    10·2 answers
  • Essay on importance of water in 200 words​
    5·1 answer
  • What was FDR‘s perspective on the pearl Habor attack
    11·1 answer
  • Which is the best summary of the passage?
    11·2 answers
  • Question 8 of 13 Which sentence contains the best example of hyperbole? With O A. Juices flowed from the veggie burger as I bit
    6·1 answer
  • Copy the link and do whatever
    5·2 answers
  • ASAP WHO EVER HAVE THE BEST ANSWER GETS BRAINLIEST! In Chapter 15, In the book, Maria says, “Forgive my cowardice, Fatima.” (p.
    9·1 answer
  • can someone pleaseee help and write a paragraph on if America changed over the past 100 years or nott
    9·1 answer
  • Help me with this one question please
    13·1 answer
  • ANSWER THESE ASAP
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!