Answer:
D) 25%
Explanation:
Productivity can be described as a measure of profitability of the work done by a company. For example a sales department may measure productivity by number of closed sales in a week.
In this instance the cleaning company will consider cost reduction an increase in productivity.
They were using 10 lbs each for house A, B, and C (30 lbs). An additional 10 lb is used increasing total chemicals used to 40 lb.
The increase in chemical usage is a drop in productivity for the company as they are spending more.
The percentage drop in productivity is a proportion of the additional quantity of chemical to total chemicals used.
Percentage drop in productivity= (10/40)*100= 25%
Answer:
d. $935.69
Explanation:
The computation of the market price of the bond is shown below:
Given that
Future value be $1,000
RATE = 6.32% ÷ 2 = 3.16%
NPER = 11 × 2 = 22
PMT = $1,000 × 5.5% ÷ 2 = $27.50
The formula is shown below:
=-PV(RATE,NPER,PMT,FV,TYPE)
After applying the above formula, the market price of the bond is $935.69
Answer: The Break-Even Point will reduce from $4,285.71 to $4,125
Explanation:
To get the Break-Even Point we can divide Fixed Assets by the Contribution margin.
The Contribution Margin is the Selling Price minus the Variable Cost.
For Scenario 1 the Break-Even Point will be,
= 15,000 / ( 6 - 2.50)
= $4,285.71
For Scenario 2 the Break-Even Point is,
= 16,500 / 6.5 -2.5
= $4,125
The Break-Even Point for Scenario 2 means that even though the higher Fixed Costs could have led to a higher Break-Even Point, the higher price contributed more than the fixed costs did and led to an ultimately lower Break-Even Point than the first Scenario.
Answer:
The correct answer is (C)
Explanation:
Negative externalities occur when an individual or firm making a choice negatively affect other parties. A driver who recklessly drives a car on a busy highway is a negative externality because the amusement of the driver is negatively affecting other people. A negative externality arises when the benefit of a decision is less than the negative outcomes of that decision.
Answer:
The correct answer is A. Both Laura and Cassie are correct.
Explanation:
Since Laura says that the present value of $ 700 to be received one year from today if the interest rate is 6 percent is less than the present value of $ 700 to be received two years from today if the interest rate is 3 percent, and Cassie says that $ 700 saved for one year at 6 percent interest has a smaller future value than $ 700 saved for two years at 3 percent interest, to determine who is right, the following calculations must be performed:
700 x 1.06 = 742
700 x 1.03 ^ 2 = 742.63
Therefore, both Laura and Cassie are correct in their claims.