The existence of pre-tax cost of debt and post-tax cost of debt is due
to the acknoledgement of the tax benefit from issuing debt.There is no
tax benefit from paying divdends,so it makes no sense talking about
pre-tax,post-tax cost of equity for a firm.When you think about cash
flow to equity you can only assume that the taxes owed by the company
have already been paid.Now, the taxation over the income of the
shareholder is a whole different issue that does not take place in this
discussion,since it is not taken in consideration either in cost of
equity or cost of debt.
Answer:
Alpha Kappa Psi is among the largest business student organizations on campus. Known for developing principled business leaders, Alpha Kappa Psi is the world's oldest business fraternity.
Tonya's company set up a booth at the college job fair to identify spring graduates who might be candidates for employment. This is an example of recruiting.
- Give candidates a chance to interact directly with the employer. Give a company the chance to evaluate the skills of a possible employee.
- All businesses must generally decide on three aspects of hiring: personnel policy, sources of hiring, and the traits and conduct of the recruiter.
- To assist your company in gaining a competitive edge through enhanced productivity, performance, and efficiency.
Employees' knowledge and abilities should be improved for their existing roles-
- Professional education
- Mentoring and coaching.
- Cross-disciplinary instruction.
- Creation of "soft skills"
Learn more about recruiting brainly.com/question/13622355
#SPJ4
Answer:
The break-even point in sales dollars is: C. $32,000
Explanation:
During the current year 11,000 hams were sold resulting in $220,000 of sales revenue, $55,000 of variable costs, and $24,000 of fixed cost.
Contribution margin ratio = (Sales - Total Variable cost)/Sales = ($220,000 - $55,000)/$220,000 = 0.75
The break-even point sales dollars is calculated by using following formula:
Break-even point in sales dollars = Fixed cost/Contribution margin ratio = $24,000/0.75 = $32,000
Answer:
Yes, because the corporation remains liable to the owner under the contract
Explanation:
The above answer is true because in this case, there is no limit to the assignment of the contractual rights between the two parties, hence this assignment of a contract would be treated as both an assignment of rights and a delegation of duties.
Therefore, while the corporation in this case has delegated its duties and assigned its rights under the contract to the developer by assigning the contract to the developer, the corporation is still considered to be liable to the owner for payment of the purchase price.
And given the fact that the developer is not as creditworthy as the corporation, and thus there is a greater chance that the developer will be unable to pay the purchase price, the owner has the rights under the contract arrangement to contractually compel the corporation to do so.
