Question

Which describes how Congress affects the president’s abilities to grant pardons and appoint cabinet members?

Answer 1

The Senate approves the cabinet members but not pardons.

Further Explanation:

According to the United States versus Klein case in 1871 Congress have no authority to limit the President‘s grant of pardon. But it can grant other amnesties. The Authority of pardoning is the least limited power given to the President that is mentioned in the constitution. The pardoning power is limited for only offences against the United States and not for state cases. They cannot affect the impeachment process. A pardon wipes out the effects of the conviction. It can only be issued at the time of offence when it is committed. In states, the pardoning power is with the governor. The development and use of pardoning power reflect several purposes. One aim is to temper justice with mercy in important cases. The second is to do justice if certain mitigating evidence occurs. Congress has enacted laws to stop corruption like Bribery and this also applies to the President's use of pardoning power. So the President cannot issue a pardon in case of bribe.

Learn More:

1. which of the following represents one of congress's electoral powers brainly.com/question/1907649
2. the constitution regulates government powers by brainly.com/question/983965

Answer Details:

Grade: High School

Chapter: Congress Powers  

Subject: Social Science

Keywords:

Limited powers, impeachment process, mitigating evidence.

Answer 2

Article II, Section 2, paragraph 2 states that the President is authorized to appoint Ambassadors, Judges of the Court of Appeal, Ministers, and other United States Officials while Congress may by law appoint lower Officers. It can be concluded that the President was given broad appointment power, the power not given to the President was exercised by Congress.

So the right answer to the question above is The Senate approves cabinet members but does not grant clemency.

EXPLANATION

Although the Senate may elect not to confirm the President’s appointment, Congress cannot limit or eliminate the President's power to make an appointment.

In Morrison v. Olson, 487 A. 654 (1988), the Supreme Court's role is to clarify the boundaries between the so-called principal officers and the inferior officers. In order to get the limit that the principal officers, included in principal officers category are cabinet members, federal judges, and ambassadors.

One important example of the position of "inferior officer" is the Independent Counsel (special prosecutor), which indicates that Congress can have the authority to appoint an Independent Counsel in the judiciary, confirming there is no partiality when a problem arises in the executive branch. Whereas examples of inferior officers include district court clerks and federal election overseers.

LEARN MORE  

If you’re interested in learning more about this topic, we recommend you to also take a look at the following questions:

• one of the strengths of the articles of confederation was it gave congress the ability to __________

brainly.com/question/3244320

 

KEYWORD: Congress, Senate, Principal Officers, Inferior Officers, Morrison v. Olson, Independent Counsel

Subject: Social Studies  

Class: 10-12

Subchapter: Government