Answer:
Production for 2nd Quarter = 15,000 units
Explanation:
given data
ending inventory of finished goods = 25 %
finished goods inventory at year start = 4,000 units
so we consider here Quarter sales in unit
1 = 12,000
2 = 14,000
3 = 18,000
4 = 16,000
solution
we get here Production for 2nd Quarter that is
Production for 2nd Quarter = Quarter 2 sale + Desired Q2 ending inventory - Beginning Q2 inventory ...................1
so it will be as
Production for 2nd Quarter = Quarter 2 sale + (25% of Q3 Sale) - (25% of Q2 sale)
put here value
Production for 2nd Quarter = 14000 + (18000 × 25%) - (14000 × 25%)
Production for 2nd Quarter = 14000 + 4500 - 3500
Production for 2nd Quarter = 15,000 units
Answer:
The answer is A.
Explanation:
According to the details given in the question on the two financial advisor's approach, the first advisor does not request a payment but a commission on the funds purchased with the inheritance money. The second advisor does request payment for the job and also a share on the assets managed with the inheritance money.
If Kirby wants to minimize the upfront expenses which can be described as the sum that is paid before a service or a job is done, then the first advisor is the better option. So the answer is A.
I hope this answer helps.
Answer:
Dr. Cr.
Cash $514,100
Discount on bond payable $15,900
Bond Payable $530,000
Explanation:
Cash is received against the Bond issued is debited due to its debit nature and the bond payable account is credited because it is a liability and its nature is credit.
Cash Received = ( 530,000 / 100 ) x 97 = $514,100
Discount = (530,000/100) x (100 - 97) = $15,900
Answer: No, because all of the defendant's facilities and offices are in State A.
Explanation:
Following the information given in the question, a federal district court cannot have subject matter jurisdiction over the plaintiff's action.
In this case, there's no subject matter jurisdiction by the court as theres subject matter jurisdiction when there is full diversity of citizenship, and the amount of controversy is more tha $75,000.
Answer:
The correct answer is: monopolistic competition.
Explanation:
There is monopolistic competition in markets that have many companies offering similar products or services. Restaurants, grocery stores, and clothing stores, for example. Such similar products and services are not ideal substitutes for each other. In these industries the barrier to entry and exit is low.
