Answer:
a. It meets the state's legal projectile requirements.
b. It exceeds the state's requirements for caliber or gauge.
Explanation:
Answer:
It shaped ancient Egypt to a more complex society
Explanation:
they used the Nike river for transportation and to trade with each other , they used it for irrigation, they used it to fish and drink from it, they used it to grow crops and they also used it to see if a man was guilt or not chosen by the gods.
Answer:
Technology
Explanation:
Technology means the application that is used in our knowledge for everyone life on day to day basis so that the person could live in an environment.
There are various types of technologies in every sector it could be in construction line, engineering line, etc but the use of the technology is to be done by the human hands
Almost in the coming time all things are soon to be converted into an automatic machine
Therefore in the given case, the technology is the answer and the same is to be considered
According to Functionalism, society is a whole unit, made up of interrelated parts that work together.
<h3>What is
Functionalism?</h3>
Functionalism is the theory of how the only factor that determines whether anything qualifies as a cognition, emotion, or pain is also that object's functionality, or even the position it performs inside the cognitive structure of whatever it forms part.
In the process of Functionalism, the parts are interconnected, and the data are saved and will be in a quality that presents itself to the people.
Functionalism holds that civilization is indeed a cohesive system formed of interdependent elements that operate together as a whole. The entire societal structure is constructed up of interconnected elements, each of which serves a certain purpose.
Learn more about Functionalism, here:
brainly.com/question/21145944
#SPJ4
Answer:
B.mental health professionals could not reliably assess whether mental illness caused criminal behavior
Explanation:
Judge David Bazelon was who proposed to do a scientific exam about mental illness in the criminal area. In the end, his ruling established that the defendant was not responsible for his criminal act if he was suffering from being mentally unstable. However, there is no verifiable certainty that the defendant, because of his illness, committed the crimes.
