In positive punishment contingent removal of an aversive stimulus reduces the likelihood that the response will occur again in the future.
In negative punishment the contingent presentation of a stimulus reduces the likelihood the response will occur again in the future.
<h3>What do positive reinforcement and negative reinforcement have in common with each other?</h3>
- Punishment can be used in a positive or bad way, much like reinforcement.
- Any reinforcer, whether positive or negative, makes a behavioral response more likely.
- Positive or negative punishments both reduce the chance of a behavioral response.
<h3>What is reinforcement and its types?</h3>
- Everything that strengthens or improves a behavior qualifies as reinforcement.
- For instance, in a classroom context, forms of reinforcement may include praise, allowing pupils skip over unneeded assignments, or offering out small rewards like candy, extra downtime, or enjoyable hobbies.
<h3>What is positive and negative reinforcement and punishment?</h3>
- By including something desired, positive reinforcement improves the intended behavior (good).
- Aversive reinforcement reduces the goal behavior in positive punishment (bad).
- By removing an unpleasant stimulus, negative reinforcement makes the intended behavior more frequent.
Learn more about positive and negative reinforcement here:
brainly.com/question/2994390
#SPJ4
Answer:
The correct answer is - learning.
Explanation:
In this case, therapist have used stimuli sight and touch to create a new response in Chase to treat the shoe fetish to ease his distress with the help of shock to induce the response.
Therapist also use exposure and response prevention technique of classical technique to develop a learning wher he placed Chase in the situation where he was exposed to the engage in social skills and have sexual pleasure without having urge to restore or touch shoe.
Both techniques are related to learning aprroch of tratment by Classical conditioning.
Answer: 3 (III)
Explanation: An example of Cloward and Ohlin’s type III youth is a juvenile who desires wealth but not entry into the middle class is the most crime-prone. However,
Cloward and Ohlin’s work based on how young people access to opportunities shapes their life chances and influences the degree to which they end up committing crimes. They stressed on “ opportunity” , they argue that we don't all live in the same environment that provide us with opportunities, and school doesn’t prepare us for the outside world equally.
Answer:
People of the Paleolithic era were hunters and gatherers. They led a nomadic life gathering around for food. In the Neolithic era, people settled down having a more sedentary life style. They started growing grains and also started storage of food.
