Regarding the source, we can comment on the following.
- Because you forgot to attach the article, we do not know the content of it. However, we gladly can comment on the following general terms.
- The source of información has to be valid, and you have to cite it in your article.
- The validation of your article depends on the proper primary and secondary sources you cite as part of your arguments.
- That is the reason why the sources for the article influence the content of the article.
- Good sources mean a solid argument and more interest on the part of your readers.
- Bad or questionable sources mean that your article won't have the credibility needed to be accepted.
We conclude that is very important for the writer to include reliable primary and secondary sources in his article to impact the audience.
Learn more about this topic here:
brainly.com/question/336747?referrer=searchResults
Nebuchadnezzar would be your answer
Howe enjoyed the comforts of Philadelphia
Answer: I believe it is C
Explanation: It caused people to question the governments rule, and reject the governments authority based on religous beleifs and instead started to support governments that granted individual rights and favored democracy
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
No, I don't think that any of these industries are morally wrong?
As the passage in the Bible says: "the one who is not guilty of nothing can throw the first rock," which menas that nobody has granted us the right to judge.
It is true that there are many industries that are controversial among animal advocacy groups. Some of these include rodeos, horse racing, circuses, hunting,
Many of these companies do not have the proper facilities or the proper care for animals. But that is not the case of all.
Although this is a controversial issue, some of these companies take care of animals and employ hundreds of people that support their families and pay taxes. Furthermore, they fulfill an important function in the entertainment industry.
So my suggestion would be that federal and state regulations could be more strict to protect animals, by closing those industries is not the better option.
