1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Thepotemich [5.8K]
2 years ago
15

Why were early Christians considered traitors to the Roman Empire

History
1 answer:
Sholpan [36]2 years ago
5 0
Because they did not believe in roman gods that's why they were considered traitors to the Roman Empire. Hope this helps! ^0^ :D
You might be interested in
Private citizens can only influence government if they act as members of interest groups.
Tom [10]

Question: Private citizens can only influence government if they act as members of interest groups.

Answer: False

Explanation: only people who can do this is canadites like from diffrent states or the government

question answered by

(jacemorris04)

7 0
2 years ago
How did Descartes and Kepler contribute to the new scientific thinking?
AveGali [126]
The answer is A since they did show how mathematics and measurement could be used in scientific investigation
7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
why did the 1933: New Deal / cooperative federalism / marble cake federalism cause a change in the makeup of the power balance b
stepladder [879]

1933: New Deal / cooperative federalism / marble cake federalism cause a change in the makeup of the power balance between local, state and national goverment in the following way

Explanation:

  • The United States moved from dual federalism to cooperative federalism in the 1930s. National programs would increase the size of the national government and may not be the most effective in local environments. Cooperative federalism does not apply to the Judicial branch of the government.
  • Each level of government is dominant within its own sphere. ... Marble cake federalism – Conceives of federalism as a marble cake in which all levels of government are involved in a variety of issues and programs, rather than a layer cake, or dual federalism, with fixed divisions between layers or levels of government.
  • As a theory, dual federalism holds that the federal and state governments both have power over individuals but that power is limited to separate and distinct spheres of authority, and each government is neither subordinate to nor liable to be deprived of its authority by the other.
  • The first, dual federalism, holds that the federal government and the state governments are co-equals, each sovereign. In this theory, parts of the Constitution are interpreted very narrowly, such as the 10th Amendment, the Supremacy Clause, the Necessary and Proper Clause, and the Commerce Clause
  • The advantages of this system are that it protects local areas and jurisdictions from the overreach of the federal government. The framers of the Constitution were afraid that the federal government would have too much power, and this system was a means of preventing that situation from developing.
  • Historically, the definitive example of dual federalism is the United States. ... These states can check the federal government through judicial action. Europe, too, has a system of dual federalism, albeit set up with state traditions. The European Union (EU) is organized into a federalist government with limited powers.

8 0
2 years ago
Which statement best describes the influence of Latin today?
Reil [10]

Answer:

C

Explanation:

Because it’s C

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Read the excerpt from Robert Yates’s notes from the Constitutional Convention on June 11, 1787. Mr. Wilson was of opinion, and t
beks73 [17]

Answer:

The Three-Fifths Compromise established that a state’s enslaved population would be counted for partial representation.

Explanation:

The Three-Fifths Compromise was an agreement made between delegates during the Constitutional Convention (1787) that established that the number of seats in the House of Representatives for each state should be calculated in accordance to the number of free persons (excluding Indians not taxed) and the three-fifths of slaves in every state. In other words, the Compromise counted three out of every five slaves as people for partial representation. This agreement would increase the power of slave states.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • During the high Middle Ages in Europe, thousands of trees were cleared to make way for
    12·1 answer
  • Why did the United States shipping industry flourishe in the late 1700s
    5·1 answer
  • Which policy is a country using when it regulates it's colonies' imports and exports to produce a favorable balance of trade?
    7·1 answer
  • What groups are organized to back a particular candidate
    12·1 answer
  • In the 1830s, who became the dictator of Mexico?
    12·1 answer
  • PLS HELP
    14·2 answers
  • On the eve of the American invasion of the Japanese-held island of Iwo Jima, how was the mood of the
    9·1 answer
  • FREE POINTS TO THOSE WHO WORK HARD!!!!!!!!
    14·2 answers
  • No one who was lazy or tried to live by the work of others was tolerated; everyone had to work. Thus on certain days each lord w
    8·1 answer
  • How do first-person accounts help us learn about history
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!