GASB statement is the highest level of authorities rules for state and local government accounting.
Government Accounting Standard Board statements and interpretations are the best levels of authority beneath GASB's GAAP hierarchy as established via GASB Statement No. 76, The Hierarchy of typically accepted Accounting ideas for the country and nearby Governments, that's effective for FY 2016.
This concept statement is considered one of a series that the GASB has issued or will problem. Concepts Statements are intended to offer a conceptual framework of interrelated goals and essential principles that can be used as a foundation for organizing constant accounting and financial reporting requirements.
Required governmental fund statements are a balance sheet and an announcement of sales, costs, and modifications in fund balances. Required proprietary fund statements are an assertion of internet assets; an assertion of revenues, prices, and modifications in fund internet property; and a statement of coins flow.
Learn more about Government Accounting Standard Board here brainly.com/question/20757640
#SPJ4
Answer:
Investor A = $545216 .
Investor B = $352377
Investor C = $897594
Explanation:
Annual rate ( r ) = 9.38%
N = 41 years
<u> Calculate the balance at age of 65</u>
1) For Investor A
balance at the end of 10 years
= $2000 (FIA, 9.38 %, 10) (1 + 0.0938) ≈ $33845
Hence at the end of 65 years ( balance )
= $33845 (FIP, 9.38 %, 31) ≈ $545216 .
2) For investor B
at the age of 65 years ( balance )
= $2000 (FIP, 9.38%, 31) = $322159 x (1 + 0.0938) ≈ $352377
3) For Investor C
at the age of 65 years ( balance )
= $2000 (FIP, 9.38%, 41) = $820620 x (1 + 0.0938) ≈ $897594
Answer:
This is how the market for board games would be affected in the explanation below
Explanation:
Because the manufacturers of the board game expect that the demand for their games would experience a decline, they would have to adjust their Production according to the decline. This is going to shift supply curve to the left, because of the decline in the production. Then equilibrium price would then increase as the quantity decreases because of the shift of the supply curve to the left.
Answer: Yes
Explanation: In the above case, a quasi-contract was formed. This is when a bilateral contract is not in place but one party will enjoy the benefit of the activities of the other party and may be enriched by it.
A bilateral agreement is the exchange of a promise for another and in this case would have been, the promise that Dozier would pay for Paschall’s work. This was not established, however, Dozier will benefit from Paschall’s work unduly if he does not pay for the improvements. The law holds that he has to pay for Paschall’s work to prevent being unjustly enriched.
