Evaluate the business and charitable contributions of andrew carnegie and john

1 answer:

8 0

Both Carnegie and Rockefeller were the biggest businessmen and the riches in the 20th century. After all their great amount of profits garnered, both had individually decided to embark in a journey of charities. Carnegie had charity contributions that were made into school such as the Carnegie Institution, Tuskegee Instituion, and a lot more. He was dubbed as the patron saints of libraries and decided to set up more charitable foundations. Rockefeller on the other had a lot of charities and activities that gave away his excess money into charitable causes. He too had built schools by starting to build University of Chicago.

But with all their charitable and business contributions, I would say I like Carnegie more because it gave away of a lot of technologies we know of today and he is working on a principle he deeply believes in that after gaining your wealth you should contribute this wealth for the general welfare. However, Rockefeller too was great and focused his contributions on public service.

You might be interested in

In a mixed economy, how is output allocated? Question 4 options: Via the market mechanism Partly by the market mechanism and par

gladu [14]

Answer:

Partly by the market mechanism and partly by the political process.

Explanation:

Capitalist Economy is private owned economy, with no state control, having profit maximisation objective. Socialist economy is state (govt) owned economy, having social welfare objective.

Mixed Economy is an economy co-owned by private & government sector. The goal is to achieve balance between profit maximisation & social welfare. The central problems of economy 'what, how, for whom to produce' are solved by both private & government sector. Output is allocated both on the basis of free market demand & supply mechanism, also on the basis of state/ govt (political) process. The govt (political) process regulates & monitors private role through various market interventions :- maximum quotas, price ceiling, price floor etc.

7 0

3 years ago

A company that continually adds more features to an existing product to try to appeal to more customers may end up overwhelming

Sloan [31]

It can be noted that when the addition of more features to an existing product overwhelm the customers, it is known as feature fatigue.

<h3>What is feature fatigue?</h3>

Feature fatigue simply means when consumers shy away from products that appear to be rich in features.

This occurs ehen a company continually adds more features to an existing product to try to appeal to more customers may end up overwhelming customers and create an unintended consequence.

Learn more about fatigue on:

brainly.com/question/948124

5 0

2 years ago

Jane Westerlund owns a picture-framing store, The Caplow Co. The average price she receives for a framed picture is $120. This p

Olegator [25]

Answer:

this would cause total costs to Increase and the break-even quantity to Increase.

Explanation:

Total Cost is the Sum of All Manufacturing and Non-Manufacturing Cost of a product.

Advertising expense before adjustments are at $500. The cost of advertising does not vary with the sales quantities therefore this is a fixed cost.

Therefore an Increase in the advertising expense causes an increase in Total cost figure.

Break even quantity is a function of Fixed Costs divided by Contribution per unit.The break even quantity will definitely change. By increasing the fixed costs (<em>Advertising Expense</em>), the Break even quantity will increase.

5 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What should customer service representatives use to achieve a win-win outcome between customers and their employer?

rodikova [14]

Answer:

i think it is the 3rd one I'm not sure but I need help on one of mine and it would be really good if you can help me I will appreciateit

3 0

2 years ago

How does regional institutional complexity affect mne internationalization?

Vaselesa [24]

International business research is only beginning to develop theory and evidence highlighting the importance of supranational regional institutions to explain firm internationalization. In this context, we offer new theory and evidence regarding the effect of a region's "institutional complexity" on foreign direct investment decisions by multinational enterprises (MNEs). We define a region's institutional complexity using two components, regional institutional diversity and number of countries. We explore the unique relationships of both components with MNEs' decisions to internationalize into countries within the region. Drawing on semiglobalization and regionalization research and institutional theory, we posit an inverted U-shaped relationship between a region's institutional diversity and MNE internationalization: extremely low or high regional institutional diversity has negative effects on internationalization, but moderate diversity has a positive effect on internationalization. Larger numbers of countries within the region reduces MNE internationalization in a linear fashion. We find support for these predicted relationships in multilevel analyses of 698 Japanese MNEs operating in 49 countries within 9 regions. Regional institutional complexity is both a challenge and an opportunity for MNEs seeking advantages through the aggregation and arbitrage of individual country factors.

3 0

2 years ago