Answer:
It could work, but really, it is just ineffective because there is a high risk of losing and falling into debt. Lotteries and slot machines are just not worth it. You could end up with less money for education than more.
Explanation:
It flows by solids of like conduction sim pretty sure it sorry if it’s wrong
Answer:
Miranda v. Arizona 384 U.S. 436 (1966) is a historical case examined by the Supreme Court. By a decision in this case, the court established that any evidence, whether confessing or exculpatory, can be used in court only if the prosecution can prove that the suspect was informed before the interrogation about the right to a lawyer and about the right not to testify against himself. At the same time, in case of refusal of the suspect from his rights, it is necessary to prove its voluntariness. The Miranda case set a precedent requiring all police departments to inform detainees of their rights to a lawyer and silence. These warnings are called the Miranda rule. The Supreme Court equated the Miranda Rule with constitutional acts.
Explanation:
Answer: Access to water is necessary for business growth and agriculture, however drilling fro and natural gas is necessary for energy security. This makes it so regulations are too costly to the industry.
1) Not everyone agrees on the solutions to environmental problems.
2) Environmental regulation may hurt businesses.
3) Environmental regulation may hurt property owners.
4) The government must protect people’s rights to make a living.