In three to five sentences, explain why it is difficult to balance economic issues with environmental ones.

History

2 answers:

DaniilM [7]2 years ago

7 0

Answer:

The requirements for each of economic and environmental issues varies. Hence, the gain of one hurts the other. For example, paper and wood in general is a huge part of the economy (used by schools and jobs and homes everyday) but majorly impacts the environment through deforestation.

Nady [450]2 years ago

4 0

Answer: Access to water is necessary for business growth and agriculture, however drilling fro and natural gas is necessary for energy security. This makes it so regulations are too costly to the industry.

1) Not everyone agrees on the solutions to environmental problems.

2) Environmental regulation may hurt businesses.

3) Environmental regulation may hurt property owners.

4) The government must protect people’s rights to make a living.

You might be interested in

The southern colonies developed economically based on:

Finger [1]

Answer:

Explanation:

6 0

3 years ago

What was likely the most difficult part of the trail of tears for the indians?

Sidana [21]

the number of people who died on the trail_apex

3 0

3 years ago

Whose lived through the industrial revolution most likely

Nataly [62]

Answer:

Explanation:

I'm not sure what you are asking, however; anyone who has lived through the industrial revolution has been affected in multiple ways, the industrial revolution was what caused a increase in population because it was better living conditions.

6 0

3 years ago

After thousands of years buried deep under the Earth, an organism's remains may convert to blank

Stells [14]

Answer:

fossil goes in the blank part

Explanation:

5 0

3 years ago

Jim is arrested in a criminal case. He refuses to answer any question about the crime, claiming that he is "taking the Fifth Ame

Veseljchak [2.6K]

Answer:

Explanation:

if jim were forced to answer questions, then he may be incriminating himself, so he "takes the Fifth Amendment"

google says

¨The Fifth Amendment protects individuals from being forced to incriminate themselves. ... The privilege against compelled self-incrimination is defined as "the constitutional right of a person to refuse to answer questions or otherwise give testimony against himself.¨¨

4 0

3 years ago