1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
levacccp [35]
3 years ago
13

How is a rational number converted to its decimal form?

Mathematics
1 answer:
luda_lava [24]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Answer to first question is:

You can convert all fractions to decimals. The decimal forms of rational numbers either end or repeat a pattern. If the fraction is a mixed number, change it to an improper fraction. Divide the numerator by the denominator. If the division doesn't come out evenly, round the decimal off.

Answer to second question is: 0.222222

Answer to third question is: Yes

Step-by-step explanation:

Well the way I think of it is:

3/9 as a fraction is 1/3... so 1 divided by 3 equals 0.333333 repeating. You can even write it as:

   _

0.3 with the fraction bar over it because it keeps repeating.

This goes for 2/9. All you have to do is do 2 divided by 9 and you get 0.222222 repeating. You can even write it as:

<h3>   _</h3>

0.2 with the fraction bar over it because it keeps repeating.

Hope this helps, have a good day. c;


You might be interested in
Tammie loves to ride in elevators.  she went up for floors and down three floors. What floor is she on?
Vlada [557]
Floor 1




4 - 3 = 1 so it’s floor #1
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Mary has $267 in her checking account . She writes checks for $33,$65 and 112. What is the balance in her account now ?
natulia [17]

Answer:

57

Step-by-step explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Police estimate that​ 25% of drivers drive without their seat belts. If they stop 6 drivers at​ random, find the probability tha
Furkat [3]

Answer:

17.80% probability that all of them are wearing their seat belts.

Step-by-step explanation:

For each driver stopped, there are only two possible outcomes. Either they are wearing their seatbelts, or they are not. The drivers are chosen at random, which mean that the probability of a driver wearing their seatbelts is independent from other drivers. So we use the normal probability distribution to solve this problem.

Binomial probability distribution

The binomial probability is the probability of exactly x successes on n repeated trials, and X can only have two outcomes.

P(X = x) = C_{n,x}.p^{x}.(1-p)^{n-x}

In which C_{n,x} is the number of different combinations of x objects from a set of n elements, given by the following formula.

C_{n,x} = \frac{n!}{x!(n-x)!}

And p is the probability of X happening.

Police estimate that​ 25% of drivers drive without their seat belts.

This means that 75% wear their seatbelts, so p = 0.75

If they stop 6 drivers at​ random, find the probability that all of them are wearing their seat belts.

This is P(X = 6).

P(X = x) = C_{n,x}.p^{x}.(1-p)^{n-x}

P(X = 6) = C_{6,6}.(0.75)^{6}.(0.25)^{0} = 0.1780

17.80% probability that all of them are wearing their seat belts.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
PLEASE HELP<br><br> Which of the following inequalities is true according to the number line?
Svetach [21]

Answer:

A ≥ D

Step-by-step explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Graph the solution set of: 2x - 4 ≤ 8 and x + 5 ≥ 7​
Alex17521 [72]

Answer:

x ≤ 6 and x ≥ 2

Step-by-step explanation:

For now, we will start with doing each problem at a time. Here is your equation:

2x - 4 ≤ 8

First, you want to get the variable by itself. So, you add 4 to both sides. It will look like this:

2x - 4 ≤ 8

+ 4 + 4

The four being added on the left side cancels out, and you add 4 to 8. Now, it should look like this:

2x ≤ 12

Next, you want the x by itself. So, you would divide both sides by 2.

2x ≤ 12

/2 /2

2 divided by 2 cancels out, and 12 divided by 2 equals 6. Now, you have a final answer of:

x ≤ 6

But, you now have to do the other one!

Here is what you start off with:

x + 5 ≥ 7

First, you want the variable side by itself. So, you subtract 5 from both sides.

x + 5 ≥ 7

- 5 -5

Now, you have this:

x ≥ 2

Because the variable is already by itself, you don't need to do any more division and this is you final answer. Now put both answers you got together which equals:

x ≤ 6 and x ≥ 2

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • 1+1+3+5+9-10+5-39+8=?
    15·2 answers
  • Round off $95,498 to the nearest hundredth
    14·2 answers
  • The circumference of a circle is about 37.7 cm and the diameter is about 12 cm. What expression best represents the value of π ?
    10·1 answer
  • Let S be the sphere of radius 1 centered at (1, 4, 7). Find the distance from S to the plane x + y + z = 0. (HINT: Use Lagrange
    14·1 answer
  • What model describes the relationship between the amount of bacteria and time, given that the bacteria quadruple every two hours
    13·2 answers
  • -3(x+5) - (2x+3) equals
    11·1 answer
  • 5. What is the surface area of the following shape? <br> 20 cm<br> 6 cm<br> 40 cm
    5·1 answer
  • Help! Jeez these are hard.
    5·1 answer
  • The distance from Wakefield to London is 180 miles. A train travels this distance in 2 hours 15 minutes. Calculate the average s
    14·1 answer
  • Match the arc or central angle to the correct measure based on the figure below.
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!