Answer:- B. No, because the corresponding congruent angles listed are not the included angles.
Explanation:-
Given:- ΔWXY and ΔBCD with ∠X ≅∠C, WX ≅ BC, and WY ≅ BD.
Now, look at the attachment
We can see that ∠X and ∠C are not included angles by the corresponding equal sides.
⇒ We cannot use SAS postulate to show ΔWXY ≅ ΔBCD .
⇒ B is the right option.
SAS postulate tells the if two sides of a triangle and their included angle is equal to the two sides of a triangle and their included angle of another triangle then the two triangles are congruent.
Answer:
x=-4, y=7
Step-by-step explanation:
According to the first equation, y = -4x - 9, so we can substitute y in the second equation for -4x - 9.
y = 3x + 19
-4x - 9 = 3x + 19
Add 9 to both sides
-4x = 3x + 28
Subtract 3x
-7x = 28
Divide by -7
x = -4
Plugging this into the equation, we have:
y = -4x - 9
y = -4(-4) - 9
y = 16 - 9
y = 7
-9/2 = -1/4(-2)+ b
-9/2 = 1/2 + b
Minus 1/2 over
B= -5
Hope this helps!
Answer:
I believe it's 4,080
Step-by-step explanation:
you just add the two numbers
Answer:
D. <b ≅ <g
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that lines p and q are parallel to each other, therefore the following can be concluded:
✔️<f ≅ <h, this is because they are both Vertical angles.
✔️<d and <h are supplematry, this is because they are same side consecutive interior angles. Consecutive angles are supplematry.
✔️<a and <b are supplematry, this is because they are linear pair angles.
✔️<b cannot be congruent to <g. They are not corresponding angles, nor are they alternate interior angles.
