Answer:
Contribution margin ratio = 69.23%
Explanation:
We know,
Contribution margin ratio = (Contribution Margin per unit ÷ Sales per unit) × 100
Again, we know, Contribution margin per unit = Sales per unit - Variable cost per unit
Given,
Sales price per unit = $6.50
Variable cost per unit = $2.00
Therefore, Contribution margin per unit = $6.50 - $2.00 = $4.50
Putting the values into the above formula, we can get,
Contribution margin ratio = ($4.50 ÷ $6.50) × 100 = 69.23% (Rounded to two decimal places)
Answer:
e. a and c
Explanation:
The law of demand states that the higher the price, the lower the quantity demanded and the lower the price, the higher the quantity demanded. This occurs because of the law of diminishing marginal utility.
The law of diminishing marginal utility states that the more of a commodity is consumed, the lower the utility derived from the consumption of the product.
It follows that Jorge and karissa would demand less of pencils and sweaters as their prices rise.
The demand curve is usually downward sloping to illustrate the law of demand.
company B has the greater operating leverage
What is operating leverage?
A cost-accounting method called operating leverage assesses how much a company or project can raise operating income by raising revenue. A company with significant operating leverage creates sales with a high gross margin and low variable costs.
The break-even point of a business is determined using operating leverage, which also aids in determining the right selling prices to cover all expenditures and make a profit.
Regardless of whether they sell any units of product, businesses with significant operational leverage must cover a bigger amount of fixed costs each month.
Low-operating-leverage businesses may have high variable costs that are directly related to sales, but they also have fewer monthly fixed expenses.
Learn more about operating leverage with the help of given link:-
brainly.com/question/6238482
#SPJ4
Answer:
Yes, Dealer could collect damages from GM because basically GM breached the contract. Any time a contract is breached, the non-breaching party can sue. But the real question here is what amount could the court assign to Dealer as compensation for damages incurred. If you want to rephrase this question, it would be: What damages did Dealer suffer due to GM's breach.
If the damages are not significant, then the court will probably assign some amount for nominal damages. To be honest, the greatest expenses here are actually the legal costs of the lawsuit. Unless Dealer can prove that assigning the contract actually hurt them (which I doubt), then the court will assign a small amount. Sometimes nominal damages can be very small and mostly symbolic, e.g. $1.
