1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
valentina_108 [34]
3 years ago
11

What type of plot structure allows authors to follow different characters through their own separate narratives, eventually conv

erging, as the story is resolved? Episodic plot structure Parallel plot structure In medias res Flash-forward
English
2 answers:
monitta3 years ago
6 0

The correct answer is parallel plot structure.


When it comes to parallel plot structure, it means that there are several characters whose stories we can see within a particular text. First we see what's going on with one character, then another one, etc. and at one point, they are going to meet, and there will be only one story from that point onward.

wlad13 [49]3 years ago
5 0
It would be a "<span>Parallel plot structure" that allows authors to do this, since the two story lines are running side-by-side. It should be noted that they need not always converge at the end. </span>
You might be interested in
Give me like these hase to be 8
forsale [732]

Answer:

why are the branches 'heavy loaded' in summer?

6 0
2 years ago
What italian city is the setting of romeo and juliet?.
Hatshy [7]
Verona, italy I’m pretty sure
8 0
1 year ago
Read 2 more answers
What does the overuse of direct quotations often reflect on your work?
Radda [10]
It often reflects that it's not yours but someone else's
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In the revelatory moment in which Prospero reunites Prince Ferdinand and King Alonso, what is the significance of Miranda and Fe
Usimov [2.4K]

i dont kow this because i havent went over that

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
Write a title of your essay on the top line. (convert into Passive )​
Harrizon [31]

Answer:

A New Constitution and a History of “Democracy”

A glance at the late 18th century U.S. political system reveals that the new Constitution was the law of a highly undemocratic land. The early United States was a society in which entire sections of the population were denied basic human rights, where the institutions of the new government were not derived from egalitarian principles, and where millions of people did not receive adequate political representation. As the overarching political instrument of the era, the Constitution bears responsibility for a society in which the many toiled without representation for the benefit of a powerful few.

Perhaps the most egregious example of the Constitution’s anti-democratic features was its sanction of the widespread practice of slavery. Rather than ending slavery, the Constitution allowed planters and others to hold their fellow human beings as chattel. Not only did the Constitution permit the existing system of slavery to continue, it permitted the Atlantic slave trade to keep “importing” slaves for 20 more years. It counted a slave as three-fifths of a human being; moreover, this provision was inserted not to protect the rights of the enslaved but to boost the electoral power of the slave states. Such a provision was not the only institutional failure of the Constitution.

The arrangement of the new federal government in the Constitution was highly unrepresentative. The president was elected indirectly through the Electoral College, while the Supreme Court was completely appointed. In the remaining branch of government, the upper house, the Senate, provided for each state to have equal representation without regard for how many people lived in the state. By diluting the power of the franchise, the Constitution made a system that was destined to be unrepresentative even more undemocratic. Only the House of Representatives nominally derived its power from the people, and its character was deeply affected by who could and could not vote.

The Constitution allowed states to set norms for who could vote in elections and who could not. In the early United States, that meant that people who did not own sufficient property, enslaved people, and women were denied the vote. A government allegedly founded on the idea of “no taxation without representation” violated this rallying cry of the American Revolution. As a result of the Constitution, a majority of people in the early United States could not vote for their representatives.

Rather than promoting a government “of the people, by the people, and for the people,” the Constitution sanctioned practices and structured institutions that were unrepresentative. Ordinary people, whether because they were enslaved, because they were women, or because they were working-class people, lived and worked without any real power. Instead, a small minority of wealthy and powerful men ruled over the majority of the population; the source of their power was the undemocratic Constitution of the United States.  

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Match the definition to the term.
    5·2 answers
  • Please help me with making a story with five of these words!
    7·2 answers
  • In Chapter 8, why does Don Quixote free the prisoners he meets?
    15·1 answer
  • How does a hyphen differ from a dash?
    12·2 answers
  • Where is the best place to find complete information about the sources for a research paper using the MLA citation format?
    11·2 answers
  • What is the setting of this short story
    11·1 answer
  • In order not to be late to school
    10·1 answer
  • Why we need the burying beetle ?
    7·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements about writing dialogue is correct? (5 points)
    11·1 answer
  • THIS SECTION TESTS YOUR ABILITTY TO IDENTIFY THE APPROPRIATE ORDER OF A PARAGRAPH.
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!