Answer:
Critical thinking
Explanation:
Critical thinking is a process of deep analysis, evaluation, and synthesis of facts and evidence that will lead to the formation of well-thought jugdement.
In this case, Christina is not analysing in a critical way because she believes the first thing she hears/reads without evaluating the sources, evidence, and facts that lie behind the claim that "the consumption of orange juice triggers hyperactivity in children."
In order to form a judgement, she would have done research that provides evidence to this claim to actually accept it.
Therefore, the correct answer would be: Christima was NOT demonstrating <u>critical</u> thinking.
Answer:
Omar has developed an intervention to improve the relationship between parents and their preschool-aged children. To evaluate the effectiveness of his intervention, Omar video-records parents interacting with their children and has two research assistants score the level of warmth in each interaction. Omar then compares the two sets of scores to examine <u>interrater
</u> reliability. He finds a high positive correlation of <u>r = .87</u>
between the two raters’ scores. If the observers were rating a categorical variable, Omar could have also looked at the <u>kappa</u> statistic.
Explanation:
Predators will be less likely to find and catch the prey
The correct answer would be D=4
Are these questions from a book, article, or excerpt? I'm only asking so I can read whatever it is and try to help you figure this out.
