Physical fitness would be the answer. In order for you to walk, you have to be well enough to walk, For instance, you need to be in shape to walk. Some people are so overweight that that they need a wheel chair just to get around and are an extreme example of what it is not to be physically fit. Regular exercise should help you avoid this predicament.
Answer:
<em>C. Appear to be stable over time.</em>
Explanation:
The reasoning behind this is that in childhood, personality traits seem to be a bit of a difficulty to figure out or keep or accept or deny. It is as if it is a psychological roller coaster. Thus, b being incorrect.
Not all personality traits are stable across situations, especially those with emotional personality traits. The victim could be in a somewhat difficult situation such as being bullied, losing their job, getting into a car accident, and more. In my POV, there is no such thing as stabilization in any types of situations.
Personality traits are definitely useful for predictors of mortality, divorce, occupational attainment, etc... Say your husband has a somewhat egotistical trait and tends to blame his problems on you. This would create problems, yes? Of course it would. In the worst possible scenario these bad traits could end up getting someone killed.
The whole meaning of being social is expressing what YOU like, what YOU enjoy, finding other people who like and enjoy the same things. That is how you communicate.
:)
Answer:
B). Robert K. Merton.
Explanation:
Robert K. Merton, the American sociologist, in his 'strain' theory asserts that social structures push individuals to carry out crimes. He calls such pressure as the 'strain'(however, it could be both social pressure or individual pressure to satisfy his or her needs/wants) that leads to 'deviance'(actions or behaviors that violate formal or informal social or cultural norms or customs) which makes them criminals.
In his typology of deviant behavior which exemplified the potential differences lying between the concept of 'culturally approved goals and legitimate sources of achieving these goals' i.e. conformity. However, <u>he also states that the deviance is entirely based on an individual's motivation or belief to achieve the cultural goals as in the pursuit of one cultural goal, another is naturally violated</u>. For Example, Innovation pursues the cultural goal of creating something new and unique but goes against the existing.
I think that would be “see it in the physicians office”!
Huh? Please be more specific in your question
