Answer:
Explanation:
While the President customarily delegates supreme command of the forces in active service, there is no constitutional reason why he should do so, and he has been known to resolve personally important questions of military policy. Lincoln early in 1862 issued orders for a general advance in the hopes of stimulating McClellan to action; Wilson in 1918 settled the question of an independent American command on the Western Front; Truman in 1945 ordered that the bomb be dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.206 As against an enemy in the field, the President possesses all the powers which are accorded by international law to any supreme commander. “He may invade the hostile country, and subject it to the sovereignty and authority of the United States.”207 In the absence of attempts by Congress to limit his power, he may establish and prescribe the jurisdiction and procedure of military commissions, and of tribunals in the nature of such commissions, in territory occupied by Armed Forces of the United States, and his authority to do this sometimes survives cessation of hostilities.208 He may employ secret agents to enter the enemy’s lines and obtain information as to its strength, resources, and movements.209 He may, at least with the assent of Congress, authorize commercial intercourse with the enemy.210 He may also requisition property and compel services from American citizens and friendly aliens who are situated within the theater of military operations when necessity requires, thereby incurring for the United States the obligation to render “just compensation.”211 By the same warrant, he may bring hostilities to a conclusion by arranging an armistice, stipulating conditions that may determine to a great extent the ensuing peace.212 He may not, however, effect a permanent acquisition of territory,213 though he may govern recently acquired territory until Congress sets up a more permanent regime.214
It is to maintain order.... provide sercurity and i believe number one too
Answer:
Again tysm!!!!!!! You may go on my profile and click on a question with only 1 answer or none and answer it but you dont have to answer like solve if ya know what i mean!
Explanation:
Answer:
We can conclude that when rocks have streaks of different colors, the colors of the rocks are the same.
Explanation:
The colors of the rocks are inversely proportional to the streaks of colres they have. If two rocks have streaks of different colors it means that they will have equal colors. Likewise, if two rocks have streaks of different colors, it means that they will have the same colors. This is because the colors of the rocks depend exclusively on the absorption of the wavelengths that the minerals in the composition of the rocks may or may not absorb.
