1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Advocard [28]
3 years ago
9

Suppose there are two individuals, Casey and Rick, who live in a very simplified world where only two goods are produced and con

sumed: steak and potatoes. The production opportunity cost for Casey is 5.00 kg of steak for every kilogram of potatoes. Rick has a production opportunity cost of 3.00 kg of steak for every kilogram of potatoes. Casey eventually realizes that, through trade, both individuals can be better off. Rick is willing to trade. What price can be settled between these two parties such that both individuals can enjoy more steak and potatoes
Business
1 answer:
Maksim231197 [3]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Casey's opportunity cost of producing 1 kg of potatoes is 5 kg of steak.

Casey's opportunity cost of producing 1 kg of steak is 0.2 kg of potatoes.

Rick's opportunity cost of producing 1 kg of potatoes is 3 kg of steak.

Rick's opportunity cost of producing 1 kg of steak is 0.33 kg of potatoes.

Casey should produce steak while Rick should produce potatoes, since Rick has a comparative advantage in producing potatoes (lower opportunity cost) and Casey has a comparative advantage in producing steak.

As long as the price of steak per kilogram of potatoes is less than 5 kg of steak and more than 3 kg of steak, then both would win. In order for both of them to win is a similarly proportional way, the exchange price should be 4 kg of steak per kg of potatoes.

You might be interested in
Is anyone gonna help I posted the same thing 3 times and no one will help. Ive been stuck in my room for days trying to get this
zlopas [31]
Right a argumentive essay about people political opinions xx
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In the long run, most economists agree that a permanent increase in government spending leads to_________.
juin [17]

In the long run, most economists agree that a permanent increase in government spending leads to <u>complete</u>.

Fiscal policy refers to the use of government spending and revenue collection (taxes or tax cuts) to affect a nation's economy. The 1930s Great Depression made the prior laissez-faire approach to economic management impractical, which led to the development of the use of government revenue expenditures to affect macroeconomic variables.

The British economist John Maynard Keynes' Keynesian economics, which postulated that changes in the amount of government spending and taxation have an impact on aggregate demand and the level of economic activity, serve as the foundation for fiscal policy.

A nation's government and central bank primarily employ fiscal and monetary policy to further its economic goals. These authorities can target inflation thanks to the combination of these strategies.

To learn more about Fiscal Policy here

brainly.com/question/27250647

#SPJ4

6 0
2 years ago
The 2003 Iraq War destroyed large amounts of capital. Later, insurgent activity
grigory [225]

Answer:

Option C Higher than high income countries and similar to th growth rates in those countries.

Explanation:

The reason is that the country is attracting investments, the oil exports are growing, economy is stable, crime rate is dropping down and the terrorism is also under control. This makes the country attractive for foreign direct investments. The greater the foreign investment the greater would be the employment opportunities in the country.

7 0
3 years ago
In general, quick-service restaurants and medium- and low-priced hotels/motels are considered to be:
marissa [1.9K]
Affordable place to live for few days
8 0
3 years ago
Boyd and Susan are married filing jointly in 2019. They have three children for whom they may claim the child tax credit. Their
sesenic [268]

Answer:

$5,250

Explanation:

The child tax credit provides a $2,000 tax credit for every qualifying child under 16, but the amount starts to phase out as the married couple's income is higher than $400,000.

The tax credit phases out $50 for every $1,000 of income over the $400,000 threshold: $415,000 - $400,000 = $15,000 x $50/$1000 = $750 phase out.

total child tax credit = ($2,000 x 3 children) - $750 = $6,000 - $750 = $5,250

7 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Internationalization is the vision of creating one world unit, a single market entity.
    14·1 answer
  • Suzie Smith is a real estate sales associate. She is a top producer and likes to maintain her independence. She sets up her offi
    13·1 answer
  • Capital Chemicals Corp. recently faced a legal hassle following which many process operators resigned voluntarily. The company f
    7·1 answer
  • Strawberry Mansion Company sells its special strawberry pie for $18. The total cost to produce the pie is $10. Of this amount, $
    9·1 answer
  • A regional supermarket chain runs print, radio, and television advertisements announcing that 1 percent of its sales is donated
    14·1 answer
  • Franco owns a 60% interest in the Dulera LLC. On December 31 of the current tax year, his basis in the LLC interest is $128,000.
    13·1 answer
  • The authors of the textbook advocate using the dialectic approach to understand intercultural relationships. The dialectic appro
    12·1 answer
  • How much money do people usually make when retiring
    10·1 answer
  • You have been elected to the governing board of your church. At the first meeting you attend, mention is made of building a new
    5·1 answer
  • At August 31, 2022, Carla Vista Company has this bank information: cash balance per bank $10,690; outstanding checks $840; depos
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!