Answer:
the answer is most likely C
Explanation:
I believe that it is A
"Traded furs to make a profit"
People ( especially new parents.) instead of being consistent they only use punishment for things that originally they didn't pay attention to.
They could also use abusive words while punishing their child which is damaging and defeats the purpose of Discipline. Discipline isn't punishment. It's a word meaning To teach. Punishment just goes along with discipline if the child doesn't respond to the teaching.
DO NOT spank at the first offence the child commits. First, make sure they know what they did was wrong, second initiate a discussion on how it made you feel and what you expected of them. Forgive the first offence. Second offence, talk about how you told them last time and if they understood. Mild punishment ( time out, no TV whichever you wish.)
Third offence. Spanking. Ask them if they know what they did was wrong, find out and then deliver the punishment in a calm manner, not out of anger.
And don't say anything to them afterwards, leave them to have their cry and then come back after a bit and accept their apology and tell them you love them and that you want them to be happy and ask them if they're happy when they're good and obey you. They will see they can talk to you and that you're not unreasonable and that the punishments were not unexpected or out of anger.
99% of spankings are used because the parents are angry or because they don't know of any other solutions. I've seen good kids raised with spankings, and bad kids raised with spankings. Spankings is a Tool, the one using the tool is the one at fault for how they do it.
<span>Research indicates that minorities are most influential when they</span>
When Susan hypothesized that a person would run faster when running in a group of people than when running alone then this type of reasoning comes under the deduction process.
A deduction can be described as the results or hypothesis that we might generate from the information that is provided. In the process of deduction, the pattern in the information that is available is carefully studied and observed. Based on this pattern of information, one can deduce a result or form a hypothesis.
In the case above, when Susan hypothesizes based on the information that was already provided that social facilitation, or the presence of others, influences performance, then such a hypothesis is based on deduction reasoning based on prior information.
Although a part of your question is missing, you might be referring to this question:
Suzy was working on her doctoral dissertation and in her social psychology class, she learned that social facilitation, or the presence of others, influences performance. based on this information she hypothesized that a person would run faster when running in a group of people than when running alone. in forming this hypothesis, Suzy used what type of reasoning process?
Naturalism
Social rationalism
Deduction
Induction
To learn more about deduction, click here:
brainly.com/question/4708897
#SPJ4
