Stream-of-consciousness is a very stylistic form of free indirect discourse. It is not spontaneous, or unintentional, or anything of the sort. In fact, if anything, it's just the opposite. It's highly stylized, but also purposeful and calculating. It sees the world wholly through the character's mind instead of through their senses, save for how the mind and the senses interact.
It relates to a lot of things - free association, synesthesia, free indirect discourse, without actually being any of them.
<span>There's only a handful of writers that can actually do stream-of-consciousness writing with any success - Joyce and Faulkner come to mind immediately. In short, there's nothing wrong with trying it, but there's also nothing wrong with not having done that, but having done, say, free association instead.</span>
The participle phrase is "hearing the footsteps of its owner".
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although you forgot to include the main point 1 as a reference, we can help you with the following comment.
"How do we engage with others while staying true to ourselves?"
The best to do so is to genuinely be ourselves, truly knowing ourselves after reflecting who we are, what we aspire, what are our strengths, and weaknesses. If we know what our belief system is and why, we won't have any problem in relating to other people, although they have different belief systems and approaches to life.
We can respectfully disagree with other people's ideas and show tolerance for the way other people think.
Answer:
The narrator in Blake's "The Tyger" expresses:
D. disturbed awe.
Explanation:
The speaker in William Blake's poem "The Tyger" is in awe of the tiger. He fears and admires the tiger at the same time. The animal's aura is filled with terror and wonder. It was made to kill. Its pace, it gaze, all of it shows how terrible it is. Yet, it was created by God, just like the innocent and harmless lamb. That is what disturbs the speaker the most. How can the same creator come up with such different creatures? One that is a natural murderer, and one that is completely meek? Having that in mind, we can say the narrator in the poem expresses D. disturbed awe.
