Once there lived a thief who is orphan and robe things from house to survive. One day he went to a house to robe things over there. He noticed that the was quite and seems no one was inside it, so he bravely took a step inside. He packed all the things and ready to leave the house.
By the time he hears a cough sound from a room. He went and looked inside. There was an old man suffering from a severe cough and virus fever. He was living in that house alone. He went to him and saw him as that old man has fainted as he didn't have proper food as no one was there to take care of him.
The thief left the house but something stopped him as he feels for that old man and then he went to the kitchen to prepare a soup for him. Then he prepared a soup for him and made him drink and replaced all the things which he robed from that house and he took care of that old man until he gets recovered.
The event is the letters from the school
Jana Nanak Kajal Jansen Kajal jajanj
She infers the most important one. It is a cruel injustice to deny women the right to vote. She says it is an oligarchy based on gender which translated means that women and enslaved by the men in her household. She is not respected as mother. She is not respected as sister or as wife as long as she is not equal to men.
She makes 2 references to the Federal Constitution held to be so important to all Americans.
The first is that the constitution begins with "We the People." Who is we? How is 'we' defined? Does it mean everyone or does it mean just males. History would say most of the time it means just males.
The second reference is a good deal more complex and uses legal jargon. It is an ex post facto law. This is a law that makes it a crime for acting in a legal way. She also uses the term attainder in the same sentence which is the abolishment of a citizen's civil rights after committing a felony. What she means is that any state that passes a law that prohibits half the population from voting is committing an attainder or a ex post facto law, which the constitution expressly forbids.
I think one of the things worth noting is that she committed the felony in the 1872 election (voting illegally), and women did not receive the vote until 1920. That's nearly 48 years between her act and what she was aiming to accomplish. She did not live to see her life's work come to fruition.
