Loss Leaders, Weekly promotions and special events and location is more in retailing than in wholesaling because most retail customers must be drawn to the store location.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Usually the wholesaling doesn’t have the need to pull and drag customers towards their store areas as they mainly concentrate on bulk sales where in retailing every customers matters and it is highly necessary to drag and make customers reach out for their store so that their profit rate can be hugely increased.
Hence the retail shop owners tend to increase their sales by attractive weekly promotions and by conducting special events such as cooking classes etc. Thus events like these are more common in retailing than in wholesaling.
At their beginning, the Arabs were an incredibly weak and loose collection of cities that could have easily been destroyed by Rome, yet the long peace with Rome led to prosperity, therefore B is the answer.
The correct answer is for all clinical trials.
NIH refers to the National Institute of Health which requires every researcher to describe data and safety monitoring when it comes to all clinical trials. Clinical trials refer to experiments conducted within clinical research.
Stanley Milgram is famous for the so-called Milgram experiment where he tried finding out why and how people could be coerced into doing things outside of their own belief system - c.
This was famous because he ordered people to deliver electric shocks to other people with the people being surprisingly compliant.
Answer:
Religion declines with economic development. In a previous post that rattled around the Internet, I presented a scholarly explanation for this pattern: people who feel secure in this world have less interest in another one.
The basic idea is that wealth allows people to feel more secure in the sense that they are confident of having their basic needs met and expect to lead a long healthy life. In such environments, there is less of a market for religion, the primary function of which is to help people cope with stress and uncertainty.
Some readers of the previous post pointed out that the U.S. is something of an anomaly because this is a wealthy country in which religion prospers. Perhaps taking the view that one swallow makes a summer, the commentators concluded that the survival of religion here invalidates the security hypothesis. I do not agree.
Explanation:
The first point to make is that the connection between affluence and the decline of religious belief is as well-established as any such finding in the social sciences. In research of this kind, the preferred analysis strategy is some sort of line-fitting exercise. No researcher ever expects every case to fit exactly on the line, and if they did, something would be seriously wrong.
