The map that best suited for maritime navigation is Mercator<span> projection. Your answer to the question is A.</span>
Answer: C In a 100-meter race, two of Amy's co-participants won Silver and Bronze and she performed exceedingly well; it follows that Amy won Gold.
Explanation:
There is a flaw in the evidence presented by the lawyer, several flaws actually:
- The client could have been the culprit and left the main door and garage open as an alibi.
- There is no mention of there being an altercation with a thief that cost the wife her life.
- There is no mention of things being stolen to prove that it was a thief.
The attorney used one logic and deduced a flawed conclusion from it so the option that is similar has to do the same as the above.
Option A is not applicable here as blame was taken by the perpetrator.
Option B is not flawed as one would be expected to be late in such circumstances.
Option C has a flaw because performing exceedingly well is relative. Amy could simply be performing exceedingly well in relation to past races. Amy's co-participants could have performed even better which is why they won medals and while Amy performed exceedingly well by her standards, it was not enough to win a medal.
Option D has no flaw. It is a logical deduction and argument just like option E.
Having children of my on, I believe that children need to express their fears that way they know early in life, what and what not to be scared or frightened of. It also depends on the limit of violence in the nature of the environment.
I believe the answer is: <span>greater appreciation of life.
Mourning is a very natural occurrence that has to be endured by all people every time we lost someone that we care about.
For most people, the lost of the loved ones would open a lot of perspective regarding life, and might create a resolution to change their life to the better.</span>
Is anyone’s Brainly ads not working
