The piece of evidence from the paragraph that supports the inference that the artist is inspired by nature is:
b )He carves animals out of wood.
<h3>What inspired the artist's works?</h3>
The text shows that the artist was inspired by nature. The people watched intently as this artist shaped a log of wood. In the end, they discovered that he was trying to carve a grizzly bear from the log. His inspiration, in this case, was the animals which are part of nature. So, we can say that the artist is inspired by nature.
It is not unusual to find that many artists get inspiration from things that they find around them. For some, it is nature while others get inspiration from themselves or the people around them. Whatever the case, after they have translated their motivation into action, then observers will see the artwork and what it represents and appreciate it..
Learn more about nature here:
brainly.com/question/24514288
#SPJ1
I believe it would be an adjective clause because it describes Professor Plum. Hope I helped!
Answer:
I'm not exactly sure if this is right but I believe it is.
Explanation:
the poet most likely did this so the reader would notice how that doesnt rhyme with the other lines, not only would it draw more attention, but that it would be more important. and meant to stick out. this line also must have been the most important to the poet because he made it rhyme with only one other line.
Answer:
D.) Company controlling others
Explanation:
