I'm not completely sure, but I believe it is at the southern tip of South America
Answer:
No, the court would not have been so lenient with her.
Explanation:
Whether or not Carmela was passive in the situation or she was only guiding her father on how to go about the lawsuit, the court has every right and would have included her in the lawsuit with her father. This is so because her father and she would have been included in the lawsuit in default. Hence, it is not a matter of decency or not, but a matter of what is supposed to be.
Answer:
rule of reciprocity.
Explanation:
The rule of reciprocity refers to the social norm in which you feel obligated to do something for the person in response to what that person has done something for you. The concept of rule of reciprocation was developed by Robert Cialdini in his book titled "Influence: Psychology of Persuasion."
According to this principle, it is a universal habit in humans that one feels obligated to reciprocate to an act of generosity that has been offered by others either in a form of a material gift or a good deed. The rule of reciprocation is also used as a tool to persuade.
<u>In the given case, Daniel has used the principle of reciprocity. Daniel invited Nick for a party which was nothing but a sales pitch. He offered him complimentary food and in response, Nick felt obligated to reciprocate buy a product from Daniel.</u>
So, the correct answer is the rule of reciprocity.
Answer:
b
Explanation:
the idea is that the fossils survived much longer than their birth 2.5 million and a half years ago and may have existed among us some 300,000 years ago.