Answer:
B
Explanation:
Old men making silly ideas to help the doomed world.
The question is incomplete. This is the complete question:
Which of the following is not a permissible circumstance under which to implement a prior restraint, under Near v. Minnesota?
a. obscene publications.
b. Fighting words likely to promote immense violence.
c. Obstruction of military recruitment.
d. Publication of troop movement in the time of war.
Answer:
The answer is b. Fighting words likely to promote immense violence.
Explanation:
Although it is possible for certain words to cause immense violence when used in publications, under Near v. Minnesota (a United States Supreme Court decision which declared that prior restraints on publication violated the freedom of speech and press) it is still not permissible to implement a prior restraint, even when publications use fighting words that are likely to promote immense violence.
No one will ever know for sure. I guess they all just hate kids.
I believe the answer is: <span>reacting to different sexual scripts
Sexual scripts refers to the things that males and females expected to do when they want to initiate sexual intercourse with one another.
In the scenario above, even though breast touching is often happened during sexual intercourse, the wife acknowledge the doctor's touching as a professional effort to check her health, not to initiate intercoursse</span><span />
