1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
max2010maxim [7]
3 years ago
11

What was the effect of the Twenty-sixth Amendment?

History
2 answers:
Amanda [17]3 years ago
4 0
<span>the amendment prohibits the states and the federal government from using age as a reason for denying the right to vote to citizens of the United States who are at least eighteen years old. hope this helps and plz rate below and thank me on my profile page :)</span>
frosja888 [35]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

The effect of the Twenty-sixth Amendment is discussed below.

Explanation:

  • The Twenty-Sixth Amendment of the constitution of the United States of America prevented the government and the administration from growing up with age as a determinant for not letting the residents of the country vote, uniquely for people who are at slightest eighteen years old.
  • It assures that voters within 18 and 20 years old cannot be removed from the opportunity to choose on the statement of age.

You might be interested in
Which accurately describe Kublai Khan’s role in encouraging cross-cultural exchange? (Select all that apply.) Kublai Khan built
kumpel [21]

The correct answer is - Kublai Khan promoted religious tolerance and exchanges between Christians, Muslims, Buddhists, and Hindus.

Kublai Khan, and pretty much all the rulers of the Mongol Empire, even though mostly are portrayed as savages and barbarians, were actually one of the most tolerant of all in there time towards the different cultures and religions, and never made problems to the people they were ruling over on this basis. The Mongols can even be seen like globalists, and they encouraged cultural exchange, religious exchange and tolerance, and were trying to create an environment were people from different ethnicity, cultural and religious backgrounds would live in peace and harmony, and through it to create a unified empire.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Islam’s historical role in central asia
vesna_86 [32]

Answer:

Islam came to Central Asia in the early part of the 8th century as part of the Muslim conquest of the region. Many well-known Islamic scientists and philosophers came from Central Asia, and several major Muslim empires, including the Timurid Empire and the Mughal Empire, originated in Central Asia.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Why did President Johnson believe that the U.S. military would easily defeat the Viet Cong?
Fynjy0 [20]

Answer:

Explanation:

Because Johnson was thinking in terms of conventional warfare.  He thought that because his army was larger, his air force was tougher and better trained, his navy was massively larger, the equipment provided to his troops infinitely better, there would be no contest.

He did not understand 2 things about Vietnam.

1. He forgot that the Vietnamese had been fighting the French (and beating them). The French in effect had changed the Vietnamese into battle hardened soldiers.

2. The Vietnamese fought a guerrilla style of warfare. The came the delivered hard jabs and disappeared into the night. Conventional war tools don't easily adapt to that kind of warfare.

4 0
3 years ago
What were the patterns of industrial growth in central and eastern europe, and how did the countries in those regions deal with
aivan3 [116]
Well Eastern Europe is still a mess after USSR cause and all of the wars and money spent in wars
3 0
3 years ago
Why might critics of the first new deal have favored second new deal
Hoochie [10]

People like Southern Democrats, Conservative Republicans, and corporate leaders didn't like the New Deal because it opposed the idea of a laissez-faire philosophy to govt. Southern Conservatives didn't favor the deal because they feared that the Jim Crow Laws of their region were threatened and corporate leaders and Republican Conservatives did not want the govt. to become anti-laissez-faire. Many Conservatives thought that the deal would go on to introduce acts like the Social Security Act that would allow people to become lazy as in some cases people use the govt. However, for the Second New Deal, FDR campaigned himself as an "ordinary working-class American" which republicans (critics) favored. FDR has stated that he though direct payments to the poor were "a narcotic, a subtle destroyer of the human spirit." -- Republicans agreed with that, too.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • By the 1960s women in american society
    5·1 answer
  • BRAINLIESTTT ASAP !! PLEASE HELP ME :)<br><br> -What happened in Tiananmen Square?
    12·2 answers
  • What was the slogan the fascist used to promote loyalty to the state
    11·1 answer
  • I need help pleaseee
    6·1 answer
  • (Pls I need help!!)What did the Declaration of the Right of Man and of the Citizen do?
    13·1 answer
  • Your answer
    9·1 answer
  • The Anti Federalists demanded a Bill of Rights because they
    14·1 answer
  • List three things you learned about japan war
    5·1 answer
  • Which kingdoms grew in power and prestige in Africa in the 18th and 19th centuries?
    8·1 answer
  • What jobs did women do in ww1?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!