1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
almond37 [142]
3 years ago
12

How did the us population distribution change between the civil war and the 1920s

History
2 answers:
MArishka [77]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

US population distribution changed between the Civil War and the 1920s in a process known as "Great Migration", in which many African Americans migrated from the south to the north of the United States.

Explanation:

When the Emancipation Proclamation was signed in 1863 less than eight percent of African-Americans lived in the northeastern or midwestern states of the United States. As late as 1900 ninety percent of blacks lived in formerly slave states. The majority of this population would migrate to New York, Philadelphia, Boston, Buffalo, Baltimore, Minneapolis, Detroit, Chicago, Milwaukee, Kansas City, Columbus, St. Louis, Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Cleveland and Indianapolis, as well as many small industrial cities like Gary, Dayton, Toledo, Youngstown, Peoria, Muskegon, Omaha, Newark, Flint and Albany.

Between 1910 and 1930 the black population of the United States grew 40% in the northern states, concentrating this increase in the big cities such as Chicago, Detroit, New York, and Cleveland. This increase was greater during the 1910-1920 period. As the demographic changes occurred in the cities, there was an increase in tensions between African-Americans and the last remittances from European immigrants. Both groups came from eminently rural societies and disputed jobs and housing with the preexisting white working class. The majority of racial problems in this period were found among Irish descendants who defended their jobs from the competition of more recent immigrants and black internal immigration.

In the south the departure of hundreds of thousands of African-Americans reduced the percentage of the black population over the total. For example, in Mississippi, the black population fell from 56% to 37% between 1910 and 1970 and in South Carolina, the percentage fell from 55% to 30% in the same period.

arlik [135]3 years ago
4 0
City population grew rapidly as both immigrants and native born 
You might be interested in
What was the most important factor leading to the end of the Cold War? a)The European Economic Community formed b)Democratic rev
Yuliya22 [10]
<span>d)a U.S.-soviet peace treaty helped repair relations </span>
7 0
3 years ago
The blank is part of the Mahabharata. It is considered by some scholars to be Hinduism's most important text, and has influenced
Lana71 [14]

Answer:

  • Hinduism is comprised of a number of tales and principles about life. As Mahabharata plays a very vital role to differentiate the good from the bad, or we can say to any Hindu Mahabharata was a war that happened between Gods and then Krishna how was the good guy won the war but he eliminated the elements like Ravaan during the process to take control of the world and make it a more peaceful place to live in.
  • So, basically it tells the whole story of good versus bad or we can say that it tells us about how can we defeat the bad or evil while being on the good side of the story and that brings the good terms into the whole process that every person requires a peaceful place to live but he or she must first fight for it. But, fight does not mean having a battle rather it means to work for that vision of ours which can bring change into the world as a whole.

3 0
3 years ago
Why was Simon Commission sent to India?<br><br> 3 detailed and developed points.
andrey2020 [161]

Answer:

The Simon Commission came to India in 1927 to generate a report on how well the 1919 Government of India Act was working. The Government of India Act established the new Indian constitution and Great Britain appointed British officials to the Simon Commission in order to oversee the effectiveness of the constitution.

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
Compared with the south what disadvantage did new england farmers face
Oksi-84 [34.3K]
New England farmers had mostly salt water, hard grounds, and unforgiving weather. Southern farmers had fresh water, soft soils, and plenty of rain and enough sunshine. 
4 0
3 years ago
John Locke thiught people were neither good nor bad naturally.How did Hobbes views differ from lockes
ruslelena [56]

Answer:  Hobbes believed people were naturally selfish and violent.

<u>Further explanation</u>:

Both English philosophers believed there is a "social contract" -- that governments are formed by the will of the people.  But their theories on why people want to live under governments were very different.

Thomas Hobbes published his political theory in <em>Leviathan </em> in 1651, following the chaos and destruction of the English Civil War.  He saw human beings as naturally suspicious of one another, in competition with each other, and evil toward one another as a result.  Forming a government meant giving up personal liberty, but gaining security against what would otherwise be a situation of every person at war with every other person.

John Locke published his <em>Two Treatises on Civil Government </em>in 1690, following the mostly peaceful transition of government power that was the Glorious Revolution in England.  Locke believed people are born as blank slates--with no preexisting knowledge or moral leanings.  Experience then guides them to the knowledge and the best form of life, and they choose to form governments to make life and society better.

In teaching the difference between Hobbes and Locke, I've often put it this way.  If society were playground basketball, Hobbes believed you must have a referee who sets and enforces rules, or else the players will eventually get into heated arguments and bloody fights with one another, because people get nasty in competition that way.   Locke believed you could have an enjoyable game of playground basketball without a referee, but a referee makes the game better because then any disputes that come up between players have a fair way of being resolved.    Of course, Hobbes and Locke never actually wrote about basketball -- a game not invented until 1891 in America by James Naismith.  But it's just an illustration I've used to try to show the difference of ideas between Hobbes and Locke.   :-)

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following was a result of kristallnacht ?
    8·2 answers
  • What was the name of the group that invested in Jamestown
    15·2 answers
  • How did increased cross-cultural interactions lead to the development of European universities?
    13·1 answer
  • Why did Columbus think he reached Asia
    15·2 answers
  • Which form of government serves the interests of royal family members
    15·2 answers
  • Answer for points 10 points
    14·2 answers
  • Helpppppppppppppppppppp​
    9·1 answer
  • 3. Describe the Battle of the Alamo. Was it a victory or a defeat, how many Texans died, were the Texans outnumbered, and how th
    6·2 answers
  • How does agriculture (farming) add to the idea of capitalism and the free market society?
    12·1 answer
  • How does the acquisition of land affect social economic and political culture of a country
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!