Even though all of the above reasons may be critical pull factors, we could safely lean towards option B, <em>higher wages</em>, as the most indicative answer. Mexicans did not necessarily get better jobs than they had back in their native country, where they may even have been skilled and educated professionals; in fact, wages may have been significantly higher in comparison to their earnings at home, allowing them for having a better quality of life and affording medical care, which tends to be expensive in the USA. Education is not necessarily free -especially at its highest levels, which would help migrants and their offspring to still further improve their quality of life- but then again, higher wages could open the possibility of accessing some private higher education.
Rain forests exist in each area except for the middle east.
If you think about it, the middle east is full with desserts and really hot areas, but not a rain forest. In desserts, its obvious that it doesnt rain; so there will obviously not have rain forests
Hope this helped :)
Answer:
The answer is symbolic interactionist theory.
Explanation:
This theory focuses on people's interaction in society, and states that we make sense of the world through language and symbols. That means we interpret things based on what we observe from others.
If, for example, you love playing soccer, this theory would assume that you learned about the importance of sports throughout your life; maybe you used to played soccer with your family and friends, or had meetings in which sports were a common topic and conversation.
