Answer:
The one you have selected is the right answer 126 times pi
Step-by-step explanation:
Exact answer - 395.840674
Answer:
40.1% probability that he will miss at least one of them
Step-by-step explanation:
For each target, there are only two possible outcomes. Either he hits it, or he does not. The probability of hitting a target is independent of other targets. So we use the binomial probability distribution to solve this question.
Binomial probability distribution
The binomial probability is the probability of exactly x successes on n repeated trials, and X can only have two outcomes.
In which
is the number of different combinations of x objects from a set of n elements, given by the following formula.
And p is the probability of X happening.
0.95 probaiblity of hitting a target
This means that 
10 targets
This means that 
What is the probability that he will miss at least one of them?
Either he hits all the targets, or he misses at least one of them. The sum of the probabilities of these events is decimal 1. So

We want P(X < 10). So

In which

40.1% probability that he will miss at least one of them
Answer:
We can see that this is dependent probability. We can find dependent probability of happening event A then event B by multiplying probability of event A by probability of event B given that event A already happened.
Step-by-step explanation:
In our case event A is pirate hitting captain's ship and event B is captain missing pirate's ship. We have been given that pirate shoots first so pirate's ship can't be hit before pirate shoots his cannons. So probability of hitting captain's ship is 1/3. We have been given that if Captain Ben's ship is already hit then Captain Ben will always miss. So the probability of Captain missing the dread pirate's ship given the pirate Luis hitting the Captain ship is 1. Now to find probability that pirate hits Captain, but Captain misses we will multiply our both probabilities.
Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:
If
, then
. It follows that
![\begin{aligned} \\\frac{g(x+h)-g(x)}{h} &= \frac{1}{h} \cdot [g(x+h) - g(x)] \\&= \frac{1}{h} \left( \frac{1}{x+h} - \frac{1}{x} \right)\end{aligned}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cbegin%7Baligned%7D%20%5C%5C%5Cfrac%7Bg%28x%2Bh%29-g%28x%29%7D%7Bh%7D%20%26%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7Bh%7D%20%5Ccdot%20%5Bg%28x%2Bh%29%20-%20g%28x%29%5D%20%5C%5C%26%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7Bh%7D%20%5Cleft%28%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7Bx%2Bh%7D%20-%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7Bx%7D%20%5Cright%29%5Cend%7Baligned%7D)
Technically we are done, but some more simplification can be made. We can get a common denominator between 1/(x+h) and 1/x.

Now we can cancel the h in the numerator and denominator under the assumption that h is not 0.
