Many observers of u.s. politics contend that the majoritarian model is not a good description of our system because Majority of American citizens are poorly informed about or uninterested in politics. "Majoritarian democracy, as opposed to constitutional democracy, refers to democracy based upon majority rule of a society's citizens."
Majoritarianism is selecting a decision based upon the final say of population who has the majority in their favor. The population with the majority gets few extra benefits so to say in various aspect of the society, and also has some rights with them to make decision that would affect the society.
to learn more about majoritarian model click below
brainly.com/question/28294643
#SPJ4
It is important to know about the impact of colonization on indigenous women in 1876 as it illustrated the effect of indigenous women and gendered roles.
<h3>What is colonization?</h3>
Colonization simply means the process of setting and establishing control over people.
In this case, it is important to know about the impact of colonization on indigenous women in 1876 as it illustrated the effect of indigenous women and gendered roles.
Learn more about colonization on:
brainly.com/question/510352
#SPJ1
Answer:
Helping others is very important. The help given to others is often returned as well, creating positive ties and trust with others. Because it's important to know not everyone is as lucky as you are.Helping others is important because it gives others the opportunity to help you feel better about yourself.
Explanation:
Both the Fifth Amendment and the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution prohibit governmental deprivations of "life, liberty, or property, without due process of law." The Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment serves three distinct functions in modern constitutional doctrine: "First, it incorporates [against the States] specific protections defined in the Bill of Rights....Second, it contains a substantive component, sometimes referred to as ‘substantive due process.'...Third, it is a guarantee of fair procedure, sometimes referred to as ‘procedural due process.'..." Daniels v. Williams (1986)
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
My position on the success of the framers' federalist design is that it has really served the interests of the United States political system.
My opinion is that balance has achieved those goals in that the federalist system -the division of powers between the national levels and the states- was intended to ensure a balance is met between the needs of society on a larger scale and the interests of citizens at a local level.
The framers believed in the principle of Federalism that is the system of government where power is divided between a central government and regional governments. The framers of the U.S. Constitution granted some faculties to the national government and granted others to the states.
The framers respected the states because they were already functioning one way or the other the people of that time were font to their states.
In other words, when we talk about United States politics, the principle of federalism refers to that the power of the government is shared by the state governments and the federal government.
This power functions under a system of checks and balances in which none of the branches of the government was more powerful than the other two. In the US government system, when federal law conflicts with state law, the federal law will win. This is included in the Constitution as the Supremacy Clause.
