All categories

3 years ago

The smaller claims an author proves on the way to proving his big argument are ________________.

Social Studies

2 answers:

Svetllana [295]3 years ago

5 0

I believe the answer is A, sub-claims. I hope this helps :)

maxonik [38]3 years ago

5 0

Answer:

Option A.

Explanation:

Sub-claims, is the right answer.

In the context of “Critical Reading Practices,” those individual claims that sustain your central claim, are known as the Sub-claims. AS each major claim supports the thesis of a writer, so as, each sub-claim supports one of the major claims of a writer. In this series, a writer employs evidence to support a sub-claim.

You might be interested in

Por que llamaban a Sparta un oligarquía

Nuetrik [128]

hwisdgsbsndvdus sjsbs d ddvf g f f f f f f

8 0

3 years ago

Which is an example of a primary source? A. A historical novel about the Civil War B. A research paper C. An excerpt from a text

melamori03 [73]

Answer:

the answer is d

Explanation:

because it is written by the president himself.

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

In one application of aversive conditioning, alcohol is paired with a drug that induces vomiting. Which of the following alterna

ddd [48]

Answer:

d. Both A and C

Explanation:

Classical Conditioning is a learning strategy in which a person associates a stimulus that was previously neutral and results in a learned response. This stimulus may be natural or unconditional because it automatically starts a response; or it may be conditional, that is, a previously neutral stimulus that now becomes associated with the unconditioned stimulus now starts a conditioned response.

In this scenario, the alcohol plus the drug (stimuli) induce vomiting (response). Therefore, the conditioned stimulus is alcohol, a previously neutral stimulus that becomes associated with the drug, an unconditioned stimulus which, in conjunction, trigger a response: vomiting.

4 0

3 years ago

Describe the relationship between force, mass, and acceleration.

zepelin [54]

the more mass an object has, the more force you need to accelerate it, and the greater the force, the greater the object's acceleration.

7 0

2 years ago

If people believe their rights are being violated, they have the right to a fair and impartial hearing. This reflects the basic

olga2289 [7]

Answer:

i'd go with due process

Explanation:

The reason for this is that an impartial hearing doesn't have much to do with lifetime employment, free consent, or freedom of conscience. Then from privacy and due process, we can see that due process makes more sense because if their rights are being violated and they have an impartial hearing, this doesn't necessarily represent privacy (:

6 0

3 years ago