<u>You need to stay current with local news</u> in order to respond to questions like this. Boycotts and protests are extremely common occurrences; mainstream media, local media, and even alternative media outlets regularly cover them.
"Touch the grass," as the saying goes, implies to observe outside of your comfort zones. Get off the internet and interact with individuals who are fighting for their human fundamental needs such as adequate housing, wage increases, accessible healthcare, climate justice, cheaper costs for essential necessities like gasoline, and so on.
To provide evidence or examples in history, we can trace the 8-hour workday of today's workers back to earlier labor movements of various unions. Because of these labor movements, we despise child labor. Previously, workers' boycotts and strikes had a significant impact on how we opposed cruel capitalistic ways.
Power of the people to organize themselves to protect each other helped people create change successfully.
There's nothing wrong with knowing about the history of struggles in your own nation and siding with the downtrodden rather than looking aside and empowering the oppressors.
Learn how the Montgomery bus boycott affected the civil rights movement: brainly.com/question/8475876
#SPJ4
Answer:
worked in factories , textile factories, coal mines, glass factories, canneries, and many other types of work environments.
Explanation:
In simple definition followership means:
1. the ability or willingness to follow a leader.
2. a group of followers or supporters; following.
Followership is the actions of someone in a subordinate role. It can also be considered as a specific set of skills that complement leadership, a role within a hierarchical organization, a social construct that is integral to the leadership process, or the behaviors engaged in while interacting with leaders in an effort to meet organizational objectives.[1] As such, followership is best defined as an intentional practice on the part of the subordinate to enhance the synergetic interchange between the follower and the leader.
In organizations, “leadership is not just done by the leader, and followership is not just done by followers.” [2] This perspective suggests that leadership and followership do not operate on one continuum, with one decreasing while the other increases. Rather, each dimension exists as a discrete dimension, albeit with some shared competencies.[3]
The study of followership is an emerging area within the leadership field that helps explain outcomes. Specifically, followers play important individual, relational, and collective roles in organizational failures and successes.[4][5][6] “If leaders are to be credited with setting the vision for the department or organization and inspiring followers to action, then followers need to be credited with the work that is required to make the vision a reality.”[7]
The term follower can be used as a personality type, as a position in a hierarchy, as a role, or as a set of traits and behaviors. Studies of followership have produced various theories including trait, behavioral attributes, role, and constructionist theories in addition to exploring myths or misunderstandings about followership.
An area of land under the ruler or a state
