The extent to which these rights are protected, and enumerated in the country's laws and constitution reflect the value that the society places on individual rights.
A country, such as the United States or Japan, which enshrines the individual rights of the people in the Constitution and in its laws, clearly places a high value on such rights.
A country that does not, and even goes so far as to outlaw many of these rights, such as the right of public dissent, is not a society that places a high value on such rights (examples include China, Saudi Arabia).
Answer:
The process that would allow skeptics to assess the reliability of these findings would be if a group of scientists carried out scientific research with the same variables and demonstrated the same result that proved that vaccines cause autism, based on scientific and testable facts.
Explanation:
In 1998 a British doctor named Dr. Andrew Wakefield stated in a scientific paper published in England that Autism could be caused by the triple viral vaccine, but this is not true because many other scientific researches were carried out to confirm this statement, and it was clear just the opposite, that vaccines cannot cause autism. In addition, it was also shown that the study author had serious problems in the methodology of how the study was carried out and had proven conflicts of interest in court. The doctor was guilty of ethical, medical and scientific misconduct for publishing a fraudulent study.
For this reason, for people who do not believe that vaccines cause autism to start believing, it would be necessary for a group of scientists to carry out scientific research with a correct methodology, with testable variables and all demonstrate the same result that could be proven by scientific facts.
