Answer:
I believe its C. Afghanistan & Iraq.
Explanation:
poopjnfhuiiu42iuhi's account has been compromised.
C. determine if Georgia's citizens opposed or supported integration.
Explanation:
<u>The results of the Sibley commission were divided as it found different arguments on how people felt about doing away with segregation. </u>
It upheld that the public schools should be able to decide if they want to or do not want to integrate all students into their fold.
<u>The commission was not entirely open on the idea to close down schools that did not agree </u>and left it to the state to decide if such a thing should or should not be done.
<span>B. Focus on freedom of expression. They have in common the attitudes taken by the court before the expressions of the individuals. The case of 1919, attacks the individual for his expression against the war. The 1969 case the individual is condemned by the expression of his speech. Case 1989 condemns the individual for his expression of repulsion when burning the flag. The latter case is justified as a conviction for the offense to the flag, while the others are sentences for repression against the rights of expression.</span>
