This geographic polarization makes the population politically speaking to be very divided because these points of geographical difference are very significant for determining political polarization.
Classical Political Geography has as its precursor the German geographer Friedrich Ratzel, who laid the scientific and systematizing bases for this science with the publication, in 1897, of the work Political Geography. For Ratzel, the strength of the State was closely linked to space - in its shape, extent, relief, climate and availability of natural resources -, to its position - social relations established between the State and its circulating environment at the national and international level - and, finally, to the sense (or spirit) of the people, which represented the strength of that determined people in relation to another. These ideas, understood in a simplistic and distorted way, would be known as "geographic determinism". (Geographical determinism, however, occurs when natural elements are given the sole role in defining the constitutive aspects of societies.)
Answer: Popular sovereignty is people of federal territories deciding whether their territories would enter the Union as free or slave states
i think if im wrong sorry
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached, we can say the following.
The effect of the emphasis on loyalty to a group that had the revolutionary movement in the French people was precise that it strengthened the solidarity ties of the Frenchs who sought in that movement, and avenue to equity, liberty, and progress. It made the French people more united for a while, enduring the consequences of the movement, united. Yes, to French revolutionaries, the ideal of fraternity was just as important as the Enlightenment ideals of liberty and equality.
On the other hand, if we compared this French result to the American culture after its revolution, we can say that American colonists started to dive because of the formation of factions or political parties with divergent ideas that sometimes we're not the same as the ideas instituted by the founding fathers of the country. That is why President George Washington was not so fond of political parties.
Answer:
In 1762, Pontiac enlisted support from practically every Indian tribe from Lake Superior to the lower Mississippi for a joint campaign to expel the British from the formerly French lands. According to Pontiac's plan, each tribe would seize the nearest fort and then join forces to wipe out the undefended settlements.
