Here is my new and revised answer from my own words.
The importance of the Marbury vs. Madision Case is that the Supreme Court applied the new concept of judicial review. In this court case, this was a crucial event because it would be the first time that it was properly used. Therefore, this allowed the government to easily distinguish if laws were considered constitutional or unconstitutional and overall set a strong foundation for the judicial branch of government in the near future.
I hope this answer helped with your question, and hope you have a lovely day!
Answer:
There were two different approaches to Reconstruction. Presidential Reconstruction was the approach that promoted more leniency towards the South regarding plans for readmission to the Union. Congressional Reconstruction blamed the South and wanted retribution for causing the Civil War.
Explanation: I found this I hope it helps!
Answer:
The law prohibited: Uttering, printing, writing, or publishing any disloyal, profane, scurrilous, or abusive language intended to cause contempt,
Hitler believed in the Aryan race. He believed they were stronger, more successful, and just better in general. He wanted to rid the world of people who were not of this race, in order to create a "better" world.
<h2>Through t
he concept of prosecutorial immunity.</h2>
Explanation:
In Kalina v. Fletcher (1997), the court ruled that a prosecutor may be sued for making false statements of fact in an affidavit in support of an arrest warrant. This is occurred when Prosecutor Kalina was sued by Fletcher for making two inaccurate factual statements regarding him during his trial.
Prosecutor Kalina, therefore, seeked the provisions of prosecutorial immunity from the court to gain immunity. However, this was rejected as the court claimed that a prosecutor may be sued for making false statements of fact in an affidavit in support of an arrest warrant.
This ruling correlate with the concept of prosecutorial immunity becuase she was denied of such immunity. It ruled that her conduct could not be protected through prosecutorial immunity.
