Answer:
The Bonus Expeditionary Force.
Explanation:
They were a group of 43,000 marchers, some of them veterans of World War I who gathered in Washington D.C. in 1932 to demand the payment of their service certificates.
The name was given by the organizers as a reference to the American Expeditionary Forces. The media called them Bonus Marchers. The manifestation was supposed to be in peace, but when the Washington police attempt to remove the veterans after being ordered to do that by the Attorney General they resist. That lead to Hoover´s decision of sending the army to clear the marchers' campsite. It was considered politically disastrous to Hoover and was a contributing factor to the victory of Roosevelt in the 1932 election.
I hope this answer helps you.
Answer:
Locke wrote that all individuals are equal in the sense that they are born with certain "inalienable" natural rights. That is, rights that are God-given and can never be taken or even given away. Among these fundamental natural rights, Locke said, are "life, liberty, and property."
Explanation:
Answer:
Japanese aggressor’s conquered Allied colonies in the Pacific.
Explanation:
<span>The complete question includes a quotation and these choices: "Two years ago, the Supreme Court handed down one of the worst, and most radically activists decisions in the Court's history, Citizens United. Overturning more than a century of settles law, and with an unprecedented naiveté of the political process, the Court charted a course for legalized bribery. Sadly, both Democrats and Republicans are no following the dangerous road of unlimited money in politics. There is no question whether scandal will arise from this decision; the only question is when. On this anniversary, we call on both parties to work together to remedy the obvious damage to our political system caused by the Citizens United decision. - Sen. John McCain and former Sen. Russ Feingold, January 20, 2012." A. Allowing unrestricted corporate money into federal elections means that candidates who recieve that money are likely to be beholden to those corporate interests once in office.
B. Forcing candidates to report their campaign contributions files in the face of 100 years of American history and is a fundamental violation of an individuals privacy.
C. Disallowing corporations from spending money on behalf of individual candidates is tantamount to restricting the free speech of those running and working for those corporations.
D. Permitting organizations to raise large sums of money is the best way for the two major parties' national committees to offset the high cost of campaigns. The correct answer is A. The answer D is completely off-topic, B isn't considered a violation of an individual's privacy, as it is actually considered a legal duty in other countries, C. is a mistaken interpretation of the concerned issue.</span>