Answer:a.
It would increase by $500,000 multiplied by the reciprocal of the required reserve ratio.
Explanation:
A bank will often hold government securities as an asset. If a bank were to sell S500,000 in government securities to an individual who paid for the bond in cash and the bank placed this cash in its vault, by how much would the money supply change as a result - It would increase by $500,000 multiplied by the reciprocal of the required reserve ratio.
The money supply is the entire stock of currency and other liquid instruments circulating in a country's economy and is given by the formula:
MONEY SUPPLY = RESERVES X MONEY MULTIPLIER
Therefore the bank reserves increasing in the scenario will increase money supplier by the effect of the money multiplier or the reciprocal of the required reserve ratio.
The value of money grows fast during hyperinflation.
Hyperinflation is defined by fast and unrestricted price rises in an economy, generally at rates greater than 50% per month over time. In times of war and economic turbulence in the underlying manufacturing sector, along with a central bank creating an excessive quantity of money, hyperinflation can arise.
As essential items such as food and gasoline become limited, hyperinflation can cause price increases.
While hyperinflations are uncommon, once they start, they may quickly spiral out of control.
Therefore, the correct option is rises rapidly.
To know more about hyperinflation click here:
brainly.com/question/1297747
#SPJ4
True. A monopolist does not face the same constraints as an open or free market but instead is bounded by the consumers' demand for its products. Therefore, the firm's decision about how much to supply is directly related to its demand curve because they can produce as much or as little as the consumes demand.
Answer:
(a)
Common pace of joblessness is a mix of auxiliary and frictional joblessness.
Basic Unemployment: Occurs contribution to modern rearrangement or innovative change.
Frictional Unemployment: When individuals are in the middle of occupations for example the way toward moving from one occupation to other.
On the off chance that an enactment making it progressively hard for the organizations to terminate laborers is presented, at that point despite the fact that the activity discovering rate will stay consistent, the consistent state joblessness will stay steady. Less individuals will stay jobless at a specific time.
(b)
The activity discovering rate will change provided that prerequisite of a severance bundle will build the expense of work. This implies the business will most likely decrease the pace of contracting which will along these lines increment the pace of joblessness. Subsequently, the enactment would diminish the activity discovering rate.
(c)
The expense of contracting will increment if an enactment like this is passed. The enactment presents the idea of severance bundle for terminated laborers. This expands the expense of employing for the firm. Along these lines, the business will diminish the employing to decrease the expenses. This will diminish the business rate in a nation which will make a higher regular pace of joblessness.
Answer:
well in 3 years you will get 4,500 so you will get a profit of 1,000 but hats in three years pls mark as brainliest.
Explanation: