Answer:
A- Group think
Explanation:
In group think, bad decisions are often made because, rather than consider other alternatives, a group of people agree to a decision suggested by, in most cases, the most superior party in the room.
This form of thinking hides true opinions of other members of the group and though the decision is agreed upon, they could truly not want to be a part of the process.
In this scenario, there is an agreement with the Senior Executive on the plan of action however, nobody is interested in taking up the responsibility to follow through with the plan. This indicates a level of disagreement of other members with the plan regardless of the initially stated agreement with the plan.
Answer:
a. By establishing cross-functional teams.
Explanation:
Cross functional teams are the ones in which there are people from different departments. In this people from different departments works on the same common goal as set by the management to be achieved by the organization.
As the company has been working in the centralized functional structure, that means all the major decisions were taken by the executive management personnel, and accordingly the company can even in the establishment of cross functional team, can make this possible.
As all together each department will be working on this, and at the same time the management can keep access to the controls.
Answer:
relating the topic to the audience
Explanation:
Based on the scenario being described within the question it can be said that to gain attention and interest Paul related the topic to the audience. Paul did this by comparing Lou Gehrig to the audiences daily lives at school. By doing this it is catching the audiences attention which in term causes them to be interested in the rest of the speech that Paul is giving.
answer:
competition, goodwill with trade partners, and importation of goods
