Answer: too much elk, to less plants
Explanation: if there's to much elk, the'll eat up all the grass...which leaves other plant eaters in the area to go hungry, and if other plant eaters die, the animals who eats them will also go hungry and die.
No.... the weight of a substance is the mass of the substance multiplied with the acceleration due to gravity on it.
With a light microscope one can view the nucleus and endoplasmic reticulum, large vacuoles etc
The resolution of a light microscope is dependent on the wavelength of light that is the main beam of illumination. Light has approximately 0.4 um (UV)- 0.7um (Infrared) wavelength. Organelles smaller than about 0.5 um will be difficult to discern with a light microscope.
With an electron microscope one can view, in addition, even the ribosomes and mitochondria, chromosomes, tubules etc.
An electron microscope can discern very minute details of a cell. This is because its resolution is dependent on the very small wavelength of a beam of electrons which is approximately 0.002 um (about 10,000 times powerful than a light microscope)
The answer is D because there would be no floodwaters
If secondary consumers are removed from the ecosystem, an ecological imbalance may be created. Secondary consumers are generally feed on other animals (primary consumers) Thus, on removing secondary consumers from food chain, there will be increase in population of primary consumers as a result all the grass and other vegetation will be eaten by the primary consumers. This will leads to desertification and eventually all the top consumers will also eliminated from the ecosystem.
