Unlike the radical Republicans<span> Reconstruction </span>plan Lincoln did<span> not want to punish the South but instead wanted them to rejoin the Union as quickly as possible. </span>Johnson's Plan<span>: President </span>Johnson<span> (who was </span>Lincolns<span> successor). ... The </span>radical Republicans<span> also gave more protection to the freed black men than </span>Johnson<span>.</span>
The Council had been called to examine doctrine and reform. Charles V had wanted abuses looked at first in an attempt to please the Protestants and hopefully tempt them back to the church. Once they were back they could look at doctrine. Paul III did not want this as reforms could financially damage him and concessions could diminish his authority. The result was that two separate sections dealt with reform and doctrine simultaneously.
<span> if this helps!!</span>
The correct answer is D. In both regions, Mongols allowed the previous administrators to continue to rule.
In both Persia and Russia, the Mongols had a regional governor, and to help them they recruited staff among the local population, they usually recruited people that came from lettered families and by hereditary basis. Historians have pointed out that Russians were trained by the Mongols to take orders, to pay taxes and to supply soldiers without delay, future czars also used the same techniques later on.
This caused the population to feel “part of the power” and this way they would be against a revolt for example. It was also a way of being closer to the population by taking some of them to work with the new “government”.
It should be noted that Senator Morrill's comments are recommending a "laissez-faire" approach to industrial production.
<h3>How did Laissez Faire related to Industrial Revolution politically? </h3>
Laissez Faire can be see to have effect on the Industrial Revolution by taking power from the government even the allowance to interfere in the businesses is not given.
More also, Laissez-faire which is been referred to as the policy of minimum governmental interference that is been seen in the economic affairs of individuals as well as the society.
In conclusion, the doctrine of laissez-faire can be seen to be associated with the economists Physiocrats, from France from year 1778,therefore, It should be noted that Senator Morrill's comments are recommending a "laissez-faire" approach to industrial production.
Learn more about laissez-faire from
brainly.com/question/17259480
#SPJ1
Evidence #1 first example/ piece of evidence that's supports your claim
evidence#2 ^ same as number 1
evidence#3^same as #1
and then the summary/ conclusion sentences
in a sentence or two restate your claim / argument
