1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
larisa [96]
3 years ago
10

In colonial America, who created the Frame of Government of Pennsylvania?

History
2 answers:
Brut [27]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

B William Penn

Explanation:

hope this helps

artcher [175]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

William Penn

Explanation:

He was granted that land by Charles ll

all the other answers are wrong

You might be interested in
Write the name of drungkhags​
Sav [38]

Answer:

my name is sam your name is

8 0
3 years ago
Why was the articles of confederation set up in such a way​
Alex777 [14]

Answer:

Why did our founding fathers decide to replace the Articles of Confederation?

The Articles created a loose confederation of sovereign states and a weak central government, leaving most of the power with the state governments. The need for a stronger Federal government soon became apparent and eventually led to the Constitutional Convention in 1787.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
The indus river empties into the
astra-53 [7]
The Indus River empties into the Arabian Sea.
7 0
2 years ago
Why were the border states important to the North during the Civil War?         A. They threatened to form their own country.   
ozzi
<span> B. They were slave states that could have joined the Confederacy.  

If the border states had joined the Confederacy, it would have greatly bolstered the population as well as the army of the South. However, if the US was more lenient on the border states and allowed slavery there to a certain degree, the Border states would provide a 'buffer' zone to help protect the North from most attacks, as well as provide men for the army and factories for producing much needed supplies.

hope this helps</span>
3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why do people support the Right to Bear Arms amendment?
EleoNora [17]

Answer:

Explanation:Modern debates about the Second Amendment have focused on whether it protects a private right of individuals to keep and bear arms, or a right that can be exercised only through militia organizations like the National Guard. This question, however, was not even raised until long after the Bill of Rights was adopted.

Many in the Founding generation believed that governments are prone to use soldiers to oppress the people. English history suggested that this risk could be controlled by permitting the government to raise armies (consisting of full-time paid troops) only when needed to fight foreign adversaries. For other purposes, such as responding to sudden invasions or other emergencies, the government could rely on a militia that consisted of ordinary civilians who supplied their own weapons and received some part-time, unpaid military training.

The onset of war does not always allow time to raise and train an army, and the Revolutionary War showed that militia forces could not be relied on for national defense. The Constitutional Convention therefore decided that the federal government should have almost unfettered authority to establish peacetime standing armies and to regulate the militia.

This massive shift of power from the states to the federal government generated one of the chief objections to the proposed Constitution. Anti-Federalists argued that the proposed Constitution would take from the states their principal means of defense against federal usurpation. The Federalists responded that fears of federal oppression were overblown, in part because the American people were armed and would be almost impossible to subdue through military force.

Implicit in the debate between Federalists and Anti-Federalists were two shared assumptions. First, that the proposed new Constitution gave the federal government almost total legal authority over the army and militia. Second, that the federal government should not have any authority at all to disarm the citizenry. They disagreed only about whether an armed populace could adequately deter federal oppression.

The Second Amendment conceded nothing to the Anti-Federalists’ desire to sharply curtail the military power of the federal government, which would have required substantial changes in the original Constitution. Yet the Amendment was easily accepted because of widespread agreement that the federal government should not have the power to infringe the right of the people to keep and bear arms, any more than it should have the power to abridge the freedom of speech or prohibit the free exercise of religion.

Much has changed since 1791. The traditional militia fell into desuetude, and state-based militia organizations were eventually incorporated into the federal military structure. The nation’s military establishment has become enormously more powerful than eighteenth century armies. We still hear political rhetoric about federal tyranny, but most Americans do not fear the nation’s armed forces and virtually no one thinks that an armed populace could defeat those forces in battle. Furthermore, eighteenth century civilians routinely kept at home the very same weapons they would need if called to serve in the militia, while modern soldiers are equipped with weapons that differ significantly from those generally thought appropriate for civilian uses. Civilians no longer expect to use their household weapons for militia duty, although they still keep and bear arms to defend against common criminals (as well as for hunting and other forms of recreation).

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What is the correct definition of immigration?​
    6·2 answers
  • An effect of the third party candidates such as Theodore Roosevelt on presidential elections is
    13·1 answer
  • What is undocumented immigration
    6·2 answers
  • Who does the 27th amendment benefit?
    14·2 answers
  • You’ve learned how plants and animals traveled along with people on ships. What impact might the introduction of a nonnative ani
    15·2 answers
  • To hold office as President of the United States, a person must meet all of the constitutional requirements below except which o
    14·1 answer
  • Which consideration is made when community leaders make decisions based on money, people, and materials available?
    7·1 answer
  • 2 Points
    5·1 answer
  • The Trail of Tears was a(n)
    13·1 answer
  • In this excerpt from the Emancipation Proclamation, which phrase or sentence supports the claim that President Lincoln did not w
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!