1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kenny6666 [7]
3 years ago
13

The idea that the government does not promote or forbid a religion

History
2 answers:
Ainat [17]3 years ago
6 0
Freedom of choice describes an individual's opportunity and autonomy to perform an action selected from at least two available options, unconstrained by external parties.

Divine right of kings - the doctrine that kings derive their authority from God, not from their subjects, from which it follows that rebellion is the worst of political crimes.


Freedom of conscience - the right to follow one's own beliefs in matters of religion and morality.

Separation of church and state -
The First Amendment states that "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof."

Correct answer is D
Anestetic [448]3 years ago
5 0
I think it's D but I'm not 100% sure
You might be interested in
Which of the following was a factor on the United States dominating the world economy after the world war 2
Elis [28]
The main factor regarding the <span>United States dominating the world economy after the world war 2 was that it was a highly industrialized nation, and had not been "touched" by the war physically due to its isolation between two major oceans. </span>
6 0
3 years ago
Why did Harriet Tubman and Fredrick Douglass do?
wel
Both were born into slavery, and escaped into slavery. While Tubman physically guided slaves along the route to freedom, Douglass wrote and spoke to white audiences about the travails of living first as a slave and then as a black man, subject to the racism of the time.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In WWI, the __________________ was slow and unreliable, but effective.
Readme [11.4K]

Answer:

In WWI, the tank was slow and unreliable, but effective.

Explanation:

As we know WW1 brought many changes when it comes to war efforts. New techniques were introduced and among them usage pf tanks.

Those tanks were heavy and slow, but still practically unbroachable. They were used for the first time in 1916, but until the end of the war were used more frequent.

6 0
3 years ago
10. How did Ulysses S. Grant's military strategy differ from Robert E. Lee?
almond37 [142]

A) Grant favored defensive tactics while Lee relied on relentless offensive to win battles

5 0
3 years ago
How did land use in Rome change as a result of the Punic Wars?
garik1379 [7]
<span>a. Huge farming estates came into being.</span>
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which statement best describes the Mughal Empire during the reign of Akbar the Great?
    11·1 answer
  • The fall of the tang dynasty was caused in great part by
    7·1 answer
  • Wheat farming in California depended on
    7·1 answer
  • The powers granted to the government by the Constitution are delegated powers and can be described in all of the following ways
    10·1 answer
  • James Madison se asociaba con los
    15·1 answer
  • Which of the following is true of the time measurement systems used by ancient mesoamerican and south american cultures
    11·1 answer
  • Why do you think each Greek city state developed independent religious practices?
    7·1 answer
  • Information about how the 1918 flu spread in Europe during the first wave would best fit in which section?
    14·2 answers
  • How new economic ideas were related to industrial growth
    6·1 answer
  • Who is Gordon Guggisburg​
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!