Similarities:
All three revolutions served to decrease monarchical authority.
All three revolutions allowed for bigger citizen participation in politics.
All three revolutions gave more rights to their citizens.
Differences:
Decrease of monarchical powers:
The glorious revolution only severely reduced the power of the monarch, whereas the other two (French and American revolutions) effectively removed the monarch.
The Glorious revolution and French revolution led to immediate change, whereas the American revolution only led to an institutional change. Women were still considered property of men, and only rich white male land-owners could vote in the new American Republic.
Answer:
No caso temos que a política dos governadores consistia em um apoio por parte do presidente da república de forma irrestrita aos governadores dos estados.
Em troca, eles deveriam se utilizar do coronelismo para eleger bancadas pro governo.
Importante notar que até hoje tal fator é algo basante comum dentro do cenário político tendo em vista as alianças que os governos fazem como forma de possibilitar que haja apoio político no âmbito federal.
Explanation:
:)
Answer:
Without a doubt the expansion strengthens the United States. Greatest occasion in the development of the federal government was the Common War, which set up its in-comparability over the states. The Common War carried a lot of new capacity to the central government, and laid the basis for the development of interest groups.
Explanation:
The primary significant occasion in the development of the federal government was the endorsement of the Constitution in 1789. Before that, the US was administered under the Articles of Confederation. The Constitution is habitually commended as an archive that secures the privileges of people and restricts the forces of government. In any case, an examination of the Constitution with the Articles uncovers that the polar opposite is valid. Under the Constitution the government acquired force, was less responsible, and had more noteworthy scope to decide its own extent of activity. That is the thing that the Constitution was planned to achieve.
The Constitution set up the Constituent School for the choice of presidents, however indicated no technique for picking balloters. A few strategies were utilized, however in many states the lawmaking bodies picked them. The composers expected that in many races no up-and-comer would get a lion's share of discretionary votes. That would allow the Place of Delegates to name the president from the five top discretionary vote getters. That framework never filled in as imagined, and by 1828, with the appointment of Andrew Jackson, the current arrangement of famous deciding in favor of balloters had gotten immovably settled in, and alongside it the gathering framework. From that point on, fruitful applicants owed their prosperity to the help of their gatherings, and consequently utilized the political framework to remunerate the individuals who assisted them with getting chosen.
Celluloid the first systetic plastic.
